|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 4, 2006 13:55:30 GMT -5
This reeks of substance: don't we both belong to the so called Anglo- Saxon cultural world? You know who Locke is, right? You have heard of the Enlightenment, correct? Why emigrate to where people are foreign. Having a race plus ad-mixture is by definition compromising the race. You have no idea. You're an American who thinks he knows about life outside his own world, but in reality doesn't. You certainly couldn't speak for anybody but yourself, no matter how much you long to patronize people that you resent. My rights are being stampeded upon. The majority was never asked whether they supported the development of fifth columns in the name of multiculturalism and egalitarian insanity, or if they wanted mass third world immigration and all that comes in its wake. The majority was never asked if they appreciated having their heritage debased by a judaized media and political system that would inculcate such garbage. Yet, all of this bull happened, and I am merely reacting. The only thing that is clear is my discontent.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 4, 2006 23:11:05 GMT -5
I asked a question of you. I wasn't giving a lecture. And, as always, you failed to answer. Instead you try this cheap trick but you forget that a question isn't the same as a lecture. If I went into details and explained to you the Englighenment and the Anglo- Saxon cultural world then it would no longer be a question. It would be a lecture. So.. answer the question or just admit you don't know anything about the topic. If you need a lecture then ask and I'll consider it.
Same reason your family immigrated to Canada. If I remember correctly you're German, Polish.. and Danish? Perhaps something else. You don't think your ancestors were foreign to British culture? Sure they belong to a general Western culture... but... they were still seen as foreigners, and, culturally they were. German's are particuarly stubborn when it comes to assimilating to their host country.
Ah, so you're against racial intermarriage, which is fine for yourself, but you have no right to stop others from having children with people of another race. You can say they're "compromising" the race but people live their lives for themselves and not for you or others of your ilk.
LOL! Dude, I've been in contact with people of all persuasions and backgrounds. Based on your posts I don't think you've spent a minute around people of a different background as yourself. You appear to be very sheltered.
umm.. if anything you're the one who proclaims you speak for others based on nothing except what you read on whatever forums you like to visit. You keep telling me that people don't want this and people don't want that, but yet when I state what people want, based on apparent trends, you start bitching that it's not the case. How about this: We'll each provide statistical support for our claims of what people want or don't want. Since you're the first to bring up the will of the people you can start us off.
Join the club. Although, it would be comical hearing the word "rights" coming from your mouth. You're not exactly the poster boy for individual rights.
Apparently they're not so upset about it to take it to the streets, or make their voice known in other ways.
If something in the media upsets you then try a boycott and be active in the political system instead of bitching all the time. Come on, man... get off your ass and get the people together to speak out. Oh, right.. you won't.
The "evil media" is moved by money. If they lose money from a boycott then they change their tune. It's your job to convince people to boycott since you want change. The only other way for change is well... the way you'd prefer, I guess I can say.. force.. I'm sure you don't need to convince yourself of the morality of using force but most people tend to be put off by goon tactics.
Yeah, and you bitch and whine instead of doing anything about it. You're an inspiration to us all.
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 4, 2006 23:37:26 GMT -5
you long to patronize people that you resent. My rights are being stampeded upon. The only thing that is clear is my discontent.[/quote][/i] Sums it up, then. 
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 5, 2006 1:04:54 GMT -5
Cheap trick? What the hell? Anglo-Saxons were Teutons that ran england before the Normans. Other than in that context, I have no Idea what you're talking about.
Some of the earliest non Brits in America were German mercenaries, and assimilation was as clockwork as assimilation could possibly be. Completely unlike the catholic minorities that immigrated at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century. Whom saw themselves as Irish and catholic, or Italian and catholic, etc., whereas the Germans saw themselves as Hessians or westphalians etc., and were of the same type cultural mindframe that didn't make "smelting" all that difficult or unsavory. Even though they basically thought of the "Americans" as crypto Englishman.
Any inability to assimilate later on came because of either political reasons or problems that existed in American society itself, which they tried to remedy by limiting the amount of problematic immigration. Which is hilarious , considering catholic Europeans undesirable, yet now importing boatloads from every third world slum imaginable.
Canada had the same type attitude when they blocked non-European, mainly Chinese immigration. Though Canada's immigration problems were not very alike. A lot of it was farm oriented and "assimilation" isn't very problematic amongst farmers, unless you're a hutterite.
I am English, Scandinavian, and I had great grandparents that are German and Polish from Posen.
I am against them immigrating in the first place.
The only one that's sheltered is you. And it's from reality.
No, you try to act as if you know everybody and you know exactly what their opinions are. When in fact you don't. I don't pretend to know, or for that matter even care. What I do know is that my country never became successful because of multiculturalism and self-hating insanity. I also know that the present insanity was not a democratic process, rather the workings of of a cynical few. I don't care if they fool 99% of the population, they aren't going to fool me. They're the enemy.
They have you fooled.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 5, 2006 1:42:08 GMT -5
Sigh... When people say Anglo- Saxon culture they mean British culture. It's just another name for British culture. You expect people to respect you but how can anyone when you're so blatantly ignorant. The Germans in Pennsylvania, where there numbers were great, were considered quite foreign and there was a fear they wouldn't assimilate to anglo- saxon culture (in other words British in case you forgot). You should pick up abook called "Ethnic America." Actually, any book on German immigration would be a good sourse of reference. Clearly you're speaking without even bothering to know the facts. I already made a reference to this I believe. You should have just copied and pasted my post. I would think a farming community would be less likely to assimilate into the host community since they'd be more able to form a closely knit community without outside influence. Think of the Germans in Pennsylvania, for example. That would be understandable if they have nothing to offer. If they did have something to offer Canada and there are slots open then might as well let them on board. I've always been a fan of reality, and have experiences with the problems you ramble on about online in real life. I doubt you have. Well that's a blatant lie. You keep saying the people are tired of this and that so please refrain from lying. You obviously do think you know what people think. So lets just compare information and be done with it. It's your move.. we could start with racial intermarriage, if you like. Canada's a rather successful nation. If you're saying Canada has "never became successful" because of third world immigration then I'd have to laugh because that's a rather new phase for Canada. Canada is still the great white north so calm down. Is this your new motto?  Not sure how appealing that would be to most. Ohhhkay... so bitching on a forum about human biodiversity is going to pull the wool from everyone's eyes. You're quite the revolutionary.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 5, 2006 2:07:25 GMT -5
Whatever
The US isn't british.
People are tired of this and that. They just don't know, or are to afraid to know, why. But, even apart from them, there are plenty that know exactly why.
Sure.
They have power down to a science. The only way to reverse it would be with force. The next economic depression I guess. Which doesn't seem to far off.
I am not bitching, I am posting, and I am posting becuase I have nothing better to do presently.
|
|
Sym
Full Member
 
Posts: 104
|
Post by Sym on Feb 5, 2006 3:57:32 GMT -5
Forgot to ask...are you a Western Separatist?
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 5, 2006 4:54:32 GMT -5
Forgot to ask...are you a Western Separatist? Forgot to ask... are you a f*cking retard
|
|
Sym
Full Member
 
Posts: 104
|
Post by Sym on Feb 5, 2006 4:59:36 GMT -5
Forgot to ask...are you a Western Separatist? Forgot to ask... are you a f*cking retard I thought it was a simple yes or no question but I guess I overestimated your intelligence.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 5, 2006 5:06:16 GMT -5
Forgot to ask... are you a f*cking retard I thought it was a simple yes or no question but I guess I overestimated your intelligence. Sure, partner. 
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 5, 2006 15:57:55 GMT -5
Honestly.. I'm not sure why I waste my time with you. Never claimed it was British. America's roots are from where exactly? Turkey? Our institutions has its roots in Mali, perhaps?
Thank goodness there are websites by shady characters for such enlighten people like yourself.
I've had discussions with people over this and I'm still not convinced of an upcoming economic depression, although I don't completely disregard the view, but I wonder on what factors you base your view on.
Well, you could be working with an organization that you believe has the right ideas for a better and brighter Canada rather than post threads about the same topic over and over again. The former is more productive.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 5, 2006 15:58:57 GMT -5
This isn't the place to post a photo of yourself for classification, Duke 
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Feb 5, 2006 16:01:11 GMT -5
This isn't the place to post a photo of yourself for classification, Duke  LOL, I was about to classify him as Alpine.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 5, 2006 20:12:42 GMT -5
I am as clueless. Why???
Like what, B'nai Brith?
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 5, 2006 21:59:21 GMT -5
Lets see.. our institutions has its roots in Great Britain, our laws are based on common law, which has a history in England rather than in continental Europe, the language we speak is English, the philosophy that the founding fathers adhered to was one developed in Great Britain (the American revolution is a child of Locke rather than Rousseau, which is the father of the French revolution. Both men are of the age of Enlightenment but ging in different directions.) This nation was founded and settled by Brits... do you think they created institutions out of nothing? I don't think that organization would suit you. This one is more up your alley. It's an American organization but I'm sure they don't mind a Canuck on their roster: www.nsm88.com/index2.htmlCheck out their "25 points" I think they'd appeal to you considering your history here: www.nsm88.com/25points/25pointsengl.html
|
|