|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Dec 21, 2005 1:19:57 GMT -5
Well, I for one have always regarded kosher goods as suspect. They taste funny. So naturally, I assumed that scientists working in the service of Zionism, created foods that only Jews could eat, but that would cause health problems with Gentiles. Ultimately, I concluded that if a Gentile ate too much kosher he or she could die as a result. Therefore, I make sure that I eat nothing but the foods of the American Bible-belt heartland: beef, pork, chicken, etc. And I make sure these are not organic, but mass produced by companies with Gentile boards of directors, because organics really is an isidious form of what I call 'kosherist expansion'...
I'm all for revisionist history, but taking all these conspiracies seriously is absurd.
If you take all of the world conspiracies and hold them to be true then:
The Freemasons/Zionists/Satanists/Thulists/Bankers/Generals/Bush administration/Chinese Communist Party/Al-Qaeda/Neo-Nazis, etc. are all in control of the world. Is that true? No.
Even if all of the above groups do exist and believe that they are taking over the world, they aren't. No one person or organization has complete control...even if they created a world government. And class isn't a form of control because it's shattered along ethnic, regional, national, racial, and gender lines.
People love to see conspiracies because the truth is often not as exciting, and is a sad commentary on the world. It's easy to see political correctness and the multicultural ethos as a Zionist conspiracy to protect their place outside of Israel, rather than mass guilt and spinelessness.
It's easy to believe that the Rothschilds purposely assisted in the creation of German National Socialism because of Masonic and Zionist ends, rather than believe that these bankers really didn't give a sh*t cause they were more concerned with making a buck...
|
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 21, 2005 12:21:43 GMT -5
Well, I for one have always regarded kosher goods as suspect. They taste funny. So naturally, I assumed that scientists working in the service of Zionism, created foods that only Jews could eat, but that would cause health problems with Gentiles. Ultimately, I concluded that if a Gentile ate too much kosher he or she could die as a result. Therefore, I make sure that I eat nothing but the foods of the American Bible-belt heartland: beef, pork, chicken, etc. And I make sure these are not organic, but mass produced by companies with Gentile boards of directors, because organics really is an isidious form of what I call 'kosherist expansion'... I'm all for revisionist history, but taking all these conspiracies seriously is absurd. If you take all of the world conspiracies and hold them to be true then: The Freemasons/Zionists/Satanists/Thulists/Bankers/Generals/Bush administration/Chinese Communist Party/Al-Qaeda/Neo-Nazis, etc. are all in control of the world. Is that true? No. Even if all of the above groups do exist and believe that they are taking over the world, they aren't. No one person or organization has complete control...even if they created a world government. And class isn't a form of control because it's shattered along ethnic, regional, national, racial, and gender lines. People love to see conspiracies because the truth is often not as exciting, and is a sad commentary on the world. It's easy to see political correctness and the multicultural ethos as a Zionist conspiracy to protect their place outside of Israel, rather than mass guilt and spinelessness. It's easy to believe that the Rothschilds purposely assisted in the creation of German National Socialism because of Masonic and Zionist ends, rather than believe that these bankers really didn't give a sh*t cause they were more concerned with making a buck... I don't believe in any of that. I said that the two American presidential candidates were both former members of a Freemason type group. I never said they were planning and fulfilling world domination, rather to show the absurdity of American democracy, that would have Freemasons as the two candidates for leadership. It's not like their qualifications, proposed policy reforms and certainly not their public speaking and expression, supersede it as irrelevant. It should be relevant, they're the possible president and they have ties to freemasonry. This has nothing to do with the illuminate or anything like that, it has to do with Americans picking between two presumed former-members of a secret cult as president. In this case: Arabic Muslim terrorists have absolutely no motive for attacking the small Christian Arab community, on the contrary it would be actually harmful to the cause of whatever Islamic entity did it. Whom lately have been trying to improve their degrading status in the Islamic world. Secondly, these attacks bear the modus operandi of a sophisticated assailant, unlike the Arab Muslims that pack a car full of old artillery shells and pulls a grenade. The attacks were not claimed like Islamic terrorist attacks are claimed. Lastly, Israel has motive for the attacks, not just that but mossad has a damnable record of offenses in other nations, including assassinations and terrorist attacks in Egypt and South Lebanon. I wouldn't put it past them. |
|
|
|
Post by Bar Amru on Jan 31, 2006 11:17:14 GMT -5
Sunni? I wonder why? Arab Christians and there Muslim brothers lived harmoniously in Iraq for ages. Yet Christian churches get bombed, by terrorists. Christians of Iraq are NOT ARAB CHRISTIANS, please get it right, we have our own language, our own script, and our own culture, and it aint an Arab one. |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 31, 2006 16:29:41 GMT -5
Sunni? I wonder why? Arab Christians and there Muslim brothers lived harmoniously in Iraq for ages. Yet Christian churches get bombed, by terrorists. Christians of Iraq are NOT ARAB CHRISTIANS, please get it right, we have our own language, our own script, and our own culture, and it aint an Arab one. Ok.... What are you then babylonian? Who do you think is bombing your churches, mossad or islamics? |
|
|
|
Post by Bar Amru on Jan 31, 2006 16:46:32 GMT -5
Ok.... What are you then babylonian? Who do you think is bombing your churches, mossad or islamics? Ethnically we're Aramean Syriac Christians, but our nation and homeland is Assyrian, therefore we're Assyrians... I also doubt Mossad bombed these churches, chances are it's a wahabi act, but only God knows I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 1, 2006 18:53:27 GMT -5
Ok.... What are you then babylonian? Who do you think is bombing your churches, mossad or islamics? Ethnically we're Aramean Syriac Christians, but our nation and homeland is Assyrian, therefore we're Assyrians... I also doubt Mossad bombed these churches, chances are it's a wahabi act, but only God knows I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Bar Amru on Feb 1, 2006 20:59:59 GMT -5
Thanks for posting a person's opinion, now tell me your opinion, what is your opinion? what do you think of the link? and why did you post it? Btw, the name Assyrian was not given by the Anglicans in the 19th century (The site is false), I have evidence that the term "Assyrian" was used before the Anglicans showed up..... |
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 1, 2006 21:12:27 GMT -5
Thanks for posting a person's opinion, now tell me your opinion, what is your opinion? what do you think of the link? and why did you post it?I have my passport here, somewhere...  Don't know jackshit, dude. So whatta *you* gonna do about it?  Ooh, maybe I'm rude. So you tella me, eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bar Amru on Feb 1, 2006 21:14:47 GMT -5
Nevermind, I'm not even gonna bother lol......
|
|
