|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 5:56:04 GMT -5
It can be construed as 'racist' because the child appears to be whining, implying that Blacks just call everything racist. LOL, what you just said makes no sense.
|
|
|
Post by gambin on Jan 15, 2006 13:15:08 GMT -5
It can be construed as 'racist' because the child appears to be whining, implying that Blacks just call everything racist. LOL, what you just said makes no sense. you know what he meant. come on.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 14:04:56 GMT -5
LOL, what you just said makes no sense. you know what he meant. come on. And what he meant made no sense.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 15, 2006 17:23:21 GMT -5
you know what he meant. come on. And what he meant made no sense. How did it make no sense?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 8:18:45 GMT -5
And what he meant made no sense. How did it make no sense? LOL, because it doesn't. Saying that something is racist doesn't make that person a racist, thats why it doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 16, 2006 8:22:45 GMT -5
How did it make no sense? LOL, because it doesn't. Saying that something is racist doesn't make that person a racist, thats why it doesn't make any sense. I think he was saying that the image could be interpreted to say that blacks always whine about racism. Do you agree that there is a stereotype that blacks always yell "Racism!" to get what they want? Not that I think the image was supposed to represent anything other than a funny and cute kid.
|
|