DIENEKES

[Rarog]

Dienekes said:

Your questions are repetitive and have been answered. I'm sorry if my answers are not pleasing to you. It's perhaps time that you accepted that Russians have a small non-Caucasoid Uralic component and a substantial brunet southern Europoid Pontic Mediterranean component, instead of repeating your self ad nauseam.

You see, Dieneks, I haven't seen a single answer from you, except on the Baltic component in Russians :-)

Let's finish with it, ok? I'll post my questions again, and you will REALLY answer them finally. Agree?

Question 1.

You said tht pigmentation of the Mediterranian race is known and that the Pontic race is part of the Mediterranian race... What must be minimal percentage of brown eyes in a population to classify it as Mediterranian (Pontic)?

Question 2.

You associate TAT-C with Uralic speakers, and Uralic speakers with Proto-Uralic type, which is Europid/Mongoloid. Thus could you please PROVE (submit evidences) that the ansectral type for population of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland was flat-nosed?

Bonus question.

How can comment the fact that Russians (or at least central types, not influenced by Uralic and other types) are as depigmented as Swedes, having comparable leveks of both eye and hair blondism?

Thank you very much, Dienekes, for direct answers to my direct questions!