The Hellenic Pimpette

[galvez]

A friend and I came across the "Hellenic Pimpette":

www.eligiblegreeks.com/personals/detailedsearchresults.cfm?siteIDD=41&&n=112374

Some details about her:

I Look Like: a greek goddess..haha i dunno

About My Match: i would like to meet someone who likes to have fun someone who is good in bed, and knows how to please a woman!

Sex Drive: Very High

She is very cute. I noticed that Greek girls tend to be very sharp and have a good sense of humor.

Also, I was surprised that Greek men are in such high demand, especially by non-Greek women. They seem to be perceived as exotic. Dienekes, why are non-Greek women so crazy for Greek men? LOL.

I give "two thumbs up" to the Hellenic Pimpette.

[Dienekes]

It looks that even "Nordish" activists are attracted to women with Greek heritage, but they have to relabel them as "Nordish".

www.skadi.net/forum/showthread.php?p=71940

[Kukul-Kan]

Something Dienekes said at Skadi:

It's not surprising. European "Upper Paleolithics" are genetically related to Amerindians. In fact genealogically speaking the male component in "Upper Paleolithics" (haplogroup R) is more closely related to the male component in Amerindians (Q) and certain Mongoloids (O) than to that of other Caucasoids

That might be the reason of why you get English that look like the superb Goalkeeper Gordon Banks.

[caucasoid]

Is that proven that "the male component in "Upper Paleolithics" (haplogroup R) is more closely related to the male component in Amerindians (Q) and certain Mongoloids (O) than to that of other Caucasoids"? If it is, then it is very interesting.

[skord]

Huh? Banks looks Japanese.

[herrx]

skord said:

Huh? Banks looks Japanese.

No... he really looks Mexican.
He looks like some secondary actors of some Roberto Bolaños' series. ;D

[Melnorme]

caucasoid said:

Is that proven that "the male component in "Upper Paleolithics" (haplogroup R) is more closely related to the male component in Amerindians (Q) and certain Mongoloids (O) than to that of other Caucasoids"? If it is, then it is very interesting.

Here's what everybody's favorite Nordicist has to say on the subject :

www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/thread?forumid=262869&messageid=1073047960

[HINDI]

Now I understand the affinity of the British with bulldogs

[AWAR]

I think that both the Mongoloids, Amerindians and European Modern Palaeolithic-like peoples have a common ancestor.

[caucasoid]

AWAR said:

I think that both the Mongoloids, Amerindians and European Modern Palaeolithic-like peoples have a common ancestor.

This is undoubtedly true in that first Neanderthals, then Aurignacians and then the race associated with Magdelenian tools in Europe are all found from western Europe to Siberia. The Chancelladid racial type is ancestral to both the modern North Asians and modern Caucasoids (it makes no sense to consider early populations as part of either subspecies). I believe that the Eurasiatic labguages spread with this culture and race. This perhaps leaves Yenisei-Ostyak, Sino-Tibetan, North-Caucasian and Na-Dene as relicts of Aurignacian languages.

[caucasoid]

Melnorme said:

Here's what everybody's favorite Nordicist has to say on the subject :

www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/thread?forumid=262869&messageid=1073047960

I could not see it. Can you please copy the text here, as it sounds very interesting?

[Melnorme]

caucasoid said:

I could not see it. Can you please copy the text here, as it sounds very interesting?

Anon wrote :

Re: Genetic relationships between UP Europeans and Mongoloids? January 2 2004, 2:34 PM

It's not surprising. European "Upper Paleolithics" are genetically related to Amerindians. In fact genealogically speaking the male component in "Upper Paleolithics" (haplogroup R) is more closely related to the male component in Amerindians (Q) and certain Mongoloids (O) than to that of other Caucasoids

They share a common ancestor ~40,000 years ago, which Russian geneticists would call "Paleo-Europid". This lineage is associated with Cro-Magnons. Male Cro-Magnons mixed with Asiatic females to produce the ancestors of North Asians, Amerindians, etc.

On the other hand, Greeks have 28% HG21, which is much more closely related to sub-Saharan Y-lineages than to European lineages. The common ancestors is less than 20,000 years old, and probably lived in East Africa and looked like this:

www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1073053913.JPG

[caucasoid]

Melnorme said:

Anon wrote :

Re: Genetic relationships between UP Europeans and Mongoloids? January 2 2004, 2:34 PM

It's not surprising. European "Upper Paleolithics" are genetically related to Amerindians. In fact genealogically speaking the male component in "Upper Paleolithics" (haplogroup R) is more closely related to the male component in Amerindians (Q) and certain Mongoloids (O) than to that of other Caucasoids

They share a common ancestor ~40,000 years ago, which Russian geneticists would call "Paleo-Europid". This lineage is associated with Cro-Magnons. Male Cro-Magnons mixed with Asiatic females to produce the ancestors of North Asians, Amerindians, etc.

On the other hand, Greeks have 28% HG21, which is much more closely related to sub-Saharan Y-lineages than to European lineages. The common ancestors is less than 20,000 years old, and probably lived in East Africa and looked like this:

www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1073053913.JPG

Thank you.

I would argue that the common ancestor was around 15,000 years ago not Aurignacian times.

[Dienekes]

AWAR said:

I think that both the Mongoloids, Amerindians and European Modern Palaeolithic-like peoples have a common ancestor.

Coon was dead right on this issue:

"From this amalgamation was produced the large, rugged, and relatively un-foetalized group of Upper Palaeolithic men in Europe, North Africa, and northern Asia. This type of man passed over Bering Straits in early post-glacial times, if not earlier, to provide the basic ge-netic stock from which the American Indian developed, in combination with later arrivals. From a branch of this hyperborean group there evolved, in northern Asia, the ancestral strain of the entire specialized mongoloid family."

His only mistake was in assuming that the "hyperborean group" was sapiens-Neanderthaloid.

[AWAR]

Dienekes said:

Coon was dead right on this issue:

"From this amalgamation was produced the large, rugged, and relatively un-foetalized group of Upper Palaeolithic men in Europe, North Africa, and northern Asia. This type of man passed over Bering Straits in early post-glacial times, if not earlier, to provide the basic ge-netic stock from which the American Indian developed, in combination with later arrivals. From a branch of this hyperborean group there evolved, in northern Asia, the ancestral strain of the entire specialized mongoloid family."

His only mistake was in assuming that the "hyperborean group" was sapiens-Neanderthaloid.

I just wonder what were the main routes of the movement of the UP peoples.

Also, I found contradicting mentions that the Neanderthals were more adapted to cold than Cro-Magnids, and vice-versa.

What are the MOST 'Upper palaeolithic' populations of today? Is there any map? What is the main difference between UP's and other races and sub-races?