|
Post by human2 on Jan 28, 2006 21:07:05 GMT -5
You have to remember that Forrester uses German race science books as reference.
If I were to judge Germans by their race books, I'd think they were all retards.
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 28, 2006 21:12:38 GMT -5
Why do we keep switching back between -oid and -id? You mean one person who's 'chinky-looking' in the remotest sense - I mean the whole population by no means can be said to be pred. people who are morphologically fully Mongolid, which is a pretty clear term. "Mongoloid" as Jack Reed used it w/o a doubt means Mongolid--http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/6301/pchghg7ud.jpg--the NE block + Amerindians are the near-fully-Mongolid populations. Ho Chi Minh. He's not Mongol id, -oid rather. Does that one exmaple contradict a vague generalisation about 80 million Vietnamese. Um, no. Does yours? Um, no. This isn't logical. And Austral oid doesn't mean = Austral id, as in this Australian Aboriginals. Yeah, exactly.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 28, 2006 21:21:16 GMT -5
Ok, I didn't realize that there was a difference between -id and -oid.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 28, 2006 21:22:15 GMT -5
--the NE block + Amerindians are the near-fully-Mongolid populations. Ok, this is accurate as the term "Mongoloid" is usually used in anthropology. However, to say SE Asians are more "Australoid" than "Mongoloid" is also not accurate in anthropology. German race science books isn't science or anthropology.
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 28, 2006 21:32:13 GMT -5
I didn't say that. I said Cambodia was, and I could be wrong. As for the rest, I don't see how they could be called "Mongoloid" if it's about the English sense--Mongolid. Not fully. As far as I know, the earliest remains in SE Asia were rather close to modern day Australians, and there's always been that influence. I was being sarcastic. Old German race science books as far as I know consider Paleomongolids like Ho Chi there to be fully Mongolid, hence the name. But they're not... I guess Luzia and this page are also German race books... :/... www.andaman.org/book/chapter53/luzia/luzia.htmHere they imply SE Asian =! Mongolid.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 28, 2006 21:55:55 GMT -5
I'm not denying that anthropologists don't usually refer to modern SE Asians as "Mongoloids" in the narrowest sense. However, a general connection is usally acknowledge. Anthropologists deal with skulls and the SE Asian skull is not as evident as when you look at people in the flesh. Also, if you read those articles about the so called "Australoids" before modern Native Americans, the "southern Asia"/SE Asia they are refering to is usually prehistoric and pre-Holocene SE Asia. That's what the actual studies and experts are refering to. News article are ambiguous or contradictory sometimes. Journalists get things mixed up.
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 28, 2006 22:04:03 GMT -5
Palaemongolid is a wide term including Southern infantilised Mongolids without significant admixture and those with significant f.e. Weddoid, Negritid and Melanesid admixture. The differences are explained by the subtypes of Palaemongolid but it was recognised that most Palaemongolid forms showed ancient or even phenotypical signs of "admixture" - but the Mongolid element is obviously dominant.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 28, 2006 22:09:53 GMT -5
I was being sarcastic. Old German race science books as far as I know consider Paleomongolids like Ho Chi there to be fully Mongolid, hence the name. But they're not... Oh yeah, "palaemongolid"... never ever read this word in a real study published anywhere... That is a German race science word. That's why I said you use them as reference.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Jan 29, 2006 14:16:18 GMT -5
Lots of Chinese women are masculine as well. Being short and pale does not mean "delicate" and "ladylike". Northern Chinese women are generally not short... And short women are generally not "masculine"... Your comments, as always, are ignorant and lack thought.
I'm begining to seriously dislike you, and I never liked you to begin with. Fresh meat on my target list. ;DNone of these people are actually Mongolid. Yeah, I read your other post in the Asian eyes thread. You consider them more "Australoid"/East "Weddid" than "Mongoloid". What about Native Americans? What are they to you? You are an idiot. You just contradicted yourself. You never liked me yet are beginning to not like me. Go implode you arrogant jerk.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Jan 29, 2006 14:18:15 GMT -5
You have to remember that Forrester uses German race science books as reference. If I were to judge Germans by their race books, I'd think they were all retards. If you were to judge Germans? Ha! It's not like your word is gospel. You are a troll.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Reed on Jan 30, 2006 0:58:08 GMT -5
Women who are typical to dismember, harm, or retaliate against other: Thai Chamarro Vietnamese Cambodian Laotian Malaysian...in no particular order. Japanese and chinese women have isolated incidents of violence based on long-term abuse, stress, or just "snapping". That's what I thought. They were the first people who came to mind when you previously said that. I doubted that you were referring to Chinese women or Japanese women. I guessed that you were referring to Southeastern Asian women.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Reed on Jan 30, 2006 1:07:20 GMT -5
I used "Mongoloid" as a racial classification like "Caucasoid" or "Negroid". I'm not sure what "Mongolid" really means. I couldn't find the word in a dictionary. I assume that it means somewhat Mongoloid(?).
|
|
|
Post by partholon on Jan 30, 2006 2:39:48 GMT -5
From living from the south a while when I was younger I would guess some negroid women to have higher testosterone levels than some men (regardless of race) I have some asian family (though I am 100% european myself) and I would guess the testosterone level is a bit lower, especially considering one of my japanese relatives is a gay man.
Apologies if this post is out of line. I'm new to the forums. Thanks for letting me join!
|
|
mb
New Member
Posts: 48
|
Post by mb on Jan 30, 2006 6:08:46 GMT -5
I would guess some negroid women to have higher testosterone levels than some men (regardless of race) I don't think that's possible. Wouldn't that make them men, and not women?
|
|
|
Post by Jack Reed on Jan 30, 2006 20:01:15 GMT -5
From living from the south a while when I was younger I would guess some negroid women to have higher testosterone levels than some men (regardless of race) I have some asian family (though I am 100% european myself) and I would guess the testosterone level is a bit lower, especially considering one of my japanese relatives is a gay man. Apologies if this post is out of line. I'm new to the forums. Thanks for letting me join! LOL I wouldn't go that far. Negroid women do have higher levels of testosterone than Caucasoid women and Mongoloid women, though. I doubt that Mongoloid men are more likely to be homosexual. My guess is that the races have roughly equal percentages of homosexuals.
|
|