|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 17:25:40 GMT -5
|
|
Okai
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by Okai on Jan 25, 2006 17:35:08 GMT -5
Those Cambodians you showed are Chinese mixes. I know lots of Cambodians. You wanna know what Cambodians look like compared to Japanese? Are they all Cambodians? Post bigger pictures, those pictures are to small and at an angle..
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 17:47:04 GMT -5
Yes, they are all Cambodians. They are very variable. And it's not because they belong to separate races like genius Agrippa says. It's because out of an admixture you get a combination of looks. The right combo can even look "paleo-Europid" ;D (This is my indirect comment on how stupid the term paleomongolid is. Basically a mainstream filipino can marry an Aeta and have two different races for children as far as Agrippa is concerned, a paleo-Mongolid and a Veddid. Dumb rassen dassen logic. It's just so dense I can't help myself but make comments. Dammit. I'm mad at me. Filipino negritos:
|
|
|
Post by jam on Jan 25, 2006 17:47:46 GMT -5
It's hard to meet any full Cambodians or Filipinos with epicanthic folds. If they do have it, they tend to be 1/2 Chinese or 1/4 Chinese. Those Cambodians you showed are Chinese mixes. I know lots of Cambodians. You wanna know what Cambodians look like compared to Japanese? Yeah, they were just random pictures, so I can't tell if they're mixed. But what are real Cambodians - is that Khmer? As far as I understand, in Laos fx, there's at least four distinct peoples, is Cambodia the same? Btw with regard to their eyes, it's impossible to se in the pic you posted.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 17:51:26 GMT -5
Even full Cambodians are very variable but you can tell who is full by their eyes, their lack of fat on the face.. and skin color and face shape.
|
|
|
Post by jam on Jan 25, 2006 17:51:47 GMT -5
Yes, they are all Cambodians. They are very variable. And it's not because they belong to separate races like genius Agrippa says. It's because out of an admixture you get a combination of looks. The right combo can look "Europid".. (long face.. "Mongoloid" trait.. recessed eyes.. "negrito" trait.. a the slender, high rooted nose both have among the pop.) Filipino negritos: But, if they're a more or less stabilized mix, how can anyone be more Cambodian than anyone else, or is the Chinese mix a more recent one? Ps. the taller guy in the last pic could almost be Indian, he doesn't look all that different from some Tamil Nadu people!
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 18:07:14 GMT -5
Yes, they are all Cambodians. They are very variable. And it's not because they belong to separate races like genius Agrippa says. It's because out of an admixture you get a combination of looks. The right combo can look "Europid".. (long face.. "Mongoloid" trait.. recessed eyes.. "negrito" trait.. a the slender, high rooted nose both have among the pop.) Filipino negritos: But, if they're a more or less stabilized mix, how can anyone be more Cambodian than anyone else, or is the Chinese mix a more recent one? The Chinese are recent.. mostly within the last century but are a major component in cities. The "full" ones that do look East Asian don't even look East Asian. It's hard to explain.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 18:17:57 GMT -5
Ok, here's a good example: Both look very Asian, right? This is a full Cambodian Pol Pot I think: This is a north Chinese guy: The two guys on the left are def. not full Cambodians if Khmer at all. Their eyes and fat on the face is just give it away. They can be Vietnamese or Thai or Laotian but not Khmer.
|
|
Okai
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by Okai on Jan 25, 2006 18:42:55 GMT -5
As I've recalled, I believe Pol Pot is 1/2 Chinese. I believe what you said is flawed. Indonesians, Filipinos and Cambodians can also have the epicanthal folds in their eyes. It's not rare... These are sculptures of the Cambodians in the 10th century BTW.
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 25, 2006 18:45:09 GMT -5
Um, if those have epicanthic folds, I can't see'm.
|
|
Okai
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by Okai on Jan 25, 2006 18:49:27 GMT -5
Um, if those have epicanthic folds, I can't see'm. I meant without...
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 18:54:49 GMT -5
[ As I've recalled, I believe Pol Pot is 1/2 Chinese. No, Pol Pot, if you read his bio, isn't Chinese at all. Unless you can find something, you are just lying. Even if he is half, he doesn't look Chinese, does he? He's not full Chinese is he? Isn't that my point? I believe what you said is flawed. It's not that hard to find Cambodians without an epicanthic fold. Isn't that what I'm saying. What is wrong with you?
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 25, 2006 19:13:45 GMT -5
Um, if those have epicanthic folds, I can't see'm. I meant without... Er, sorry about that. I can't read any more apparently.
|
|
Okai
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by Okai on Jan 25, 2006 19:25:08 GMT -5
What you’ve said doesn’t make sense either way, if anything, Indonesians, Filipinos and Cambodians can also have the epicanthal folds in their eyes. It's not rare...
BTW Pol Pot is half-Chinese. A Cambodian told me.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 25, 2006 19:28:07 GMT -5
What you’ve said doesn’t make sense either way, if anything, Cambodians and Filipinos who has the epicanthic folds in their eyes, didn’t get it from Chinese.. Chinese has the highest percentage of people with no epicanthic folds… If you said, what I’ve interpreted you to have said, was that “Cambodians and Filipinos doesn’t have epicanthic folds, if they do, they’re mixed Chinese.” Which isn’t true, since Cambodians made reliefs and carvings which depicted some of them to have no epicanthic folds. BTW Pol Pot is half-Chinese. A Cambodian told me. Do you even know what epicanthic fold is? Look, Pol Pot is full Cambodian according to his bio. Maybe he is half Chinese. What does a full Cambodian look like then?
|
|