|
Post by nymos on Dec 7, 2005 2:39:04 GMT -5
Once I thought that italian, spanish men are the most attractive, because everybody claimed that they are soo pretty, nice-looking etc. When I went to Italy I was really dissapointed, because I didn't find men attractive there (exept those who seems were alpinids or something like that). OH SNAP!
|
|
|
Post by yigal on Dec 7, 2005 3:07:39 GMT -5
Armenoids aint ugly, they are elgant, most handsome race on earth,the perfect in between Euro and Afro/Asiatic caucasoids
|
|
|
Post by osservatore on Dec 7, 2005 3:10:24 GMT -5
Armenoids aint ugly, they are elgant, most handsome race on earth Agreed!
|
|
|
Post by yigal on Dec 7, 2005 3:13:05 GMT -5
hehe observatore u kinda have an Armenoid By way of Pakistan look lol
|
|
|
Post by DeLacroix on Dec 7, 2005 3:23:13 GMT -5
hehe observatore u kinda have an Armenoid By way of Pakistan look lol How come you're still up at this time of the morning , yigal? ;D
|
|
|
Post by yigal on Dec 7, 2005 3:50:14 GMT -5
hehe observatore u kinda have an Armenoid By way of Pakistan look lol How come you're still up at this time of the morning , yigal? ;D its 11 am
|
|
|
Post by quarryman on Dec 7, 2005 4:48:00 GMT -5
I think the question is problematic by principle, because the racial division of Europids was originally designed to motivate differences in the development of mankind. Nordids and Mediterraneans (Dinarids to a lesser degree) are distinguished by physical features considered to be attractive, whereas East Baltids and Alpids are explicitly described as "ugly" in older anthropoligical litterature.
Later, the picture became more diversified (through writers like Lundman and Coon) with much more sub-races. But still, the racial division of Europids is based on an aesthetical approach.
|
|
|
Post by DeLacroix on Dec 7, 2005 4:54:10 GMT -5
How come you're still up at this time of the morning , yigal? ;D its 11 am I thought you were from N.Y
|
|
|
Post by Polako on Dec 7, 2005 5:02:10 GMT -5
Medittereans, atlanto-medittereans and armenoids aren't my favourites. Wha??? I think many Atlanto-Meds look amazing. I've seen some incredible chicks around the place who fit that type precisely. Here's what I mean... www.missworld.tv/bio/bio.sps?iBiographyID=51753However, I do love some of the typical Polish phenotypes as well...like those tall Baltids with tanned bodies...yum.
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Dec 7, 2005 5:07:38 GMT -5
That costume is pretty tight in her lower parts, ain't it so? You nasty Poles .. She looks Nordic, not Baltic to me.
I would say fugliest males on average alpinids, but fugliest specimens would be meds and armenoids (big features in small faces can be superfugly). Fugliest females .. maybe borreby.
|
|
|
Post by Polako on Dec 7, 2005 6:34:43 GMT -5
That costume is pretty tight in her lower parts, ain't it so? You nasty Poles .. She looks Nordic, not Baltic to me. Hmm...nope, she's not Nordic. Definitely Baltic, maybe with some Nordic.
|
|
|
Post by Kalashnikov on Dec 7, 2005 7:11:04 GMT -5
Medittereans, atlanto-medittereans and armenoids aren't my favourites. Wha??? I think many Atlanto-Meds look amazing. I've seen some incredible chicks around the place who fit that type precisely. Here's what I mean... www.missworld.tv/bio/bio.sps?iBiographyID=51753However, I do love some of the typical Polish phenotypes as well...like those tall Baltids with tanned bodies...yum. Looks like we have similar taste about women!
|
|
|
Post by rollerball on Dec 7, 2005 7:26:28 GMT -5
For females: Armenoid, Mtebid and Anatolid individuals aren't particularly fortunate, regarding the dominant beauty matrix ( if a woman is swarthy, she must be a gracile mediterranean to be considered beautiful; if she is cromagnid and robust, she must have a clear, porcelain skin and golden hair to compensate, If she is East Mediterranean, she must have big blue eyes, bla bla bla...) The more a white subrace deviates from the Nordic/Mediterranean bone structure, the more fugly (popular view) Besides, some Armenoid women can grow black whiskers
|
|
|
Post by rollerball on Dec 7, 2005 7:43:12 GMT -5
That costume is pretty tight in her lower parts, ain't it so? You nasty Poles .. She looks Nordic, not Baltic to me. I would say fugliest males on average alpinids, but fugliest specimens would be meds and armenoids (big features in small faces can be superfugly). Fugliest females .. maybe borreby. Part of the ubersexiness of the Polish-Russian girls comes from their naivety/ lack of consciousness in FASHION. Dressing appropriately for an occasion is definitely not their strongest point. Now, that's not racist, it's just a cultural thing, they live in a different decade! I like it:)
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Dec 7, 2005 8:03:10 GMT -5
Love that camel toe. ;D
Fugly subraces would be extreme East Baltids and Armenoids.
|
|