|
Post by ethioguy on Jan 20, 2006 11:31:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Jan 20, 2006 14:12:26 GMT -5
It's cool that you posted pics of Amharas. I don't know much about them but i am here to learn from people that know about their countries or ethnic heritage. I don't take people serious when they talk about countries they have never visited.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 20, 2006 14:17:15 GMT -5
ethioguy, they are mixed. Sorry, man.
Amharas have like 30-40% Semetic lineages. There is virtually no ambiguity there.
|
|
|
Post by ethioguy on Jan 20, 2006 14:29:17 GMT -5
Amharas live in the higlands of Ethiopia. From 8000-15000 FEET HIGH. Their are 2 types of Amharas. Mixed ones and pure ones. The ones i showed you above are the purest form of amharas. unmixed. The mixed amharas look more like Haile Selassie (Ethiopias late emperor). The mixed Amharas came down from the higlands to create AXUM. During the trade they mixed with foreingers while the pure amharas were undisturbed. Any JACKASS FOREIGNER that says he know more about Ethiopia than me is obviously a troll.
People who say they are mixed are idiots. They dont show any arab sign. The place these amharas were UNREACHABLE to foreigners during aksum.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 20, 2006 14:53:28 GMT -5
Lol, what a confused guy this dodona79/euroguy/ethioguy is ;D You seem to have changed route, what happend, you don't like your med theory anymore? Let me remind you of another post you made which you named Ethiopians(closer to meds?)www.sitesled.com/members/racialreality/ethiopians.html------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Notably, 62% of the Ethiopians fall in the first cluster, which encompasses the majority of the Jews, Norwegians and Armenians, indicating that placement of these individuals in a 'Black' cluster would be an inaccurate reflection of the genetic structure. Only 24% of the Ethiopians are placed in the cluster with the Bantu and most of the Afro-Caribbeans (These ethnic groups are called the gambella and southern ethiopians) ." I agree with you that Amhara are more East African than anything, however it's also true that Amhara have recieved substantial amount of genetic input from across the read sea. Yemen among other countries in the area recieved also alot of admixture in ancient times from Horn Africa. But this does not make Amhara less East African since this happend in ancient times, way before the bantu expansion.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 20, 2006 15:16:31 GMT -5
ethioguy, they are mixed. Sorry, man. Amharas have like 30-40% Semetic lineages. There is virtually no ambiguity there. There are Yemenis with an almost equal amount of African lineages from Bantus and Ethiopians, yet Ethiopians and Yemenis look apart. Yemenis acquire most of their mixture much more recently than Ethiopians, so by that logic Yemenis are also "mixed".
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Jan 20, 2006 16:04:12 GMT -5
Mixed or not most of those look Caucasoid or Semetic.
|
|
|
Post by Sharmaarkee on Jan 20, 2006 17:25:16 GMT -5
Man i come with the conclution than un mixed Amaras were Bantu & Chineese just look @ the nappy hair & the nose realy Amara have some Congoid ancestry & chineese connection. The original founders of Axum were Tigre so how is it that you claim to be habesha & claim no form of mixing occured that is BS
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 20, 2006 17:44:21 GMT -5
ethioguy, they are mixed. Sorry, man. Amharas have like 30-40% Semetic lineages. There is virtually no ambiguity there. There are Yemenis with an almost equal amount of African lineages from Bantus and Ethiopians, yet Ethiopians and Yemenis look apart. Yemenis acquire most of their mixture much more recently than Ethiopians, so by that logic Yemenis are also "mixed". I didn't say Yemenis aren't mixed. Mixed or not most of those look Caucasoid or Semetic. Woman, do you ever analyze the data you been fed, especially as a "non-Caucasoid" woman? The term "Caucasoid" is meaningless when it ranges from this guy to this these Amharas.. How the fulk do they look alike? The "Caucasoud" or semi-"Caucasoid" or "proto-Europid" according to Dodona is anyone who doesn't look like an African gorilla or pan-faced Siberian. It's nose, which it sticks into everything not coincerning itself, ranged from the humongously hooked of King Faud and snouty to the long and thin of Tom Cruise to the medium and reserved of Brad Pitt to the tiny, buttony of Reese Witherspoon. It can have variation but God forbid the Others. That's what 90% of the flames on Dodona comes down to. So dumb. In terms of variation of 1 through 100, 1 is a "Negroid" and 100 is a "Mongoloid" and everything from 2-99 is "Caucasoid". As soon as someone posts an attractive Asian, there the follow-up post of how they are mixed. It's just self-flattery that no intelligent, self-respecting "non-Caucasoid" person, whoever and whatever that is, should take without reflecting on.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 20, 2006 17:59:01 GMT -5
As Dagaalyahan put it nicely on one of your post BS!
|
|
|
Post by magneto on Jan 20, 2006 19:26:30 GMT -5
The "Caucasoud" or semi-"Caucasoid" or "proto-Europid" according to Dodona is anyone who doesn't look like an African gorilla or pan-faced Siberian. It's nose, which it sticks into everything not coincerning itself, ranged from the humongously hooked of King Faud and snouty to the long and thin of Tom Cruise to the medium and reserved of Brad Pitt to the tiny, buttony of Reese Witherspoon. It can have variation but God forbid the Others. That's what 90% of the flames on Dodona comes down to. So dumb. In terms of variation of 1 through 100, 1 is a "Negroid" and 100 is a "Mongoloid" and everything from 2-99 is "Caucasoid". As soon as someone posts an attractive Asian, there the follow-up post of how they are mixed. It's just self-flattery that no intelligent, self-respecting "non-Caucasoid" person, whoever and whatever that is, should take without reflecting on. LOL..true
|
|
Heem
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by Heem on Jan 20, 2006 19:29:28 GMT -5
The "Caucasoud" or semi-"Caucasoid" or "proto-Europid" according to Dodona is anyone who doesn't look like an African gorilla or pan-faced Siberian. It's nose, which it sticks into everything not coincerning itself, ranged from the humongously hooked of King Faud and snouty to the long and thin of Tom Cruise to the medium and reserved of Brad Pitt to the tiny, buttony of Reese Witherspoon. It can have variation but God forbid the Others. That's what 90% of the flames on Dodona comes down to. So dumb. In terms of variation of 1 through 100, 1 is a "Negroid" and 100 is a "Mongoloid" and everything from 2-99 is "Caucasoid". As soon as someone posts an attractive Asian, there the follow-up post of how they are mixed. It's just self-flattery that no intelligent, self-respecting "non-Caucasoid" person, whoever and whatever that is, should take without reflecting on. LOL..true *claps* I agree as well.Good post,human2.
|
|
|
Post by magneto on Jan 20, 2006 19:40:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 20, 2006 21:00:43 GMT -5
The difference between Amharas and Yemenis is that the Amharas shown look all intermediate whereas in Yemenis you can find classic Orientalids (Arabids) beside fully Negrid types (Sudano-Kafrid, not even just Aethiopid...). So their mixed means mainly that there is a Negrid element in the population, mainly through slave trade most likely.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 20, 2006 22:22:24 GMT -5
Lol, there is no such thing as pure something, "classical orientalids" ;D Please prove there is such existance, show me a Yemeni that is more pure than Amhara. I dare you to prove a "classical orientalid" who is pure in Yemen? The connection between these regions existed way before your simplistic classification, the trade was extensive between the read sea, the Axumites even controlled Yemen for a long time. Your classification is based from a European perspective, please Show me a pure " classical oriental yemenite".
|
|