Mjora
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by Mjora on Dec 24, 2005 5:03:18 GMT -5
She is overrated.I don't understand how she became a topmodel.
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Dec 24, 2005 5:15:15 GMT -5
She probably handled meat for a while.
|
|
|
Post by murphee on Dec 24, 2005 5:24:06 GMT -5
As usual, to my eyes, the nose job improved appearance, but the breast implants are awful.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 24, 2005 5:37:48 GMT -5
Dukeofpain, Come on. Jews are a tiny fraction-of-a-fraction of global population. And they're always minuscule percentages of any host-population they're in. Not everybody has Jewish ancestry. Hell, 20-30% of Ashkenazic Jews don't even have "Jewish ancestry," if you go by dna tests, lol. So you're generalization is flat-wrong. To hear you speak, Jews have a billion-population like China or India. You start sounding like an antisemite who believes that there's a Jew under every bed. P.S.--Jews aren't exactly known as breeders, either. Denmark's entire Jewish population--at its height--was, like, 8,000 people. Sorry, but 8,000 people don't affect the gene-pool of a nation with 5 million . . . especially when those 8,000 have closed communities, and a culture of clannishness and exclusivity. Hell, there are more Gypsies in Europe, yet I don';t hear people claiming that EVERYONE is part-Gypsy. All I said was that most Europeans have Jewish ancestry (even if minute) it's just a question of how much. This on account of lineage being exponential. After only 20 Generations you have more than a half a million ancestors, therefore statistically a percentage of that stock would include jews, regardless if they were a comparatively small minority. This is all I said, which has nothing to do with "anti-semitism", I have no idea what you're going on about. Yes. But only because the turks have been in contact with European populations for a long time. Likewise, most Europeans also would have gypsy ancestors. Even if the actual genetic material that they've passed on is negligible, on account of their being but a drop in the proverbial ancestor bucket for many Europeans, doesn't mean that they're not their ancestors.
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Dec 24, 2005 6:12:40 GMT -5
i think she looks great now, but its a shame most of it isnt natural! (her hair colour, nose etc) - also i do think she has a bit of a trannsexual body LOL (no hips!)
|
|
|
Post by Mike the Jedi on Dec 24, 2005 7:26:38 GMT -5
Ugh. She was actually cute before she went under the knife. Not hot, but still cute and natural. No longer.
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Dec 24, 2005 10:11:57 GMT -5
Now all she needs is some hips. Thats the good thing, that she is not just very slim, almost skinny (borderline) but with good proportions, her waist-hip ratio is borderline ideal with almost 7:10. Furthermore you shouldnt judge anyone from a single and distorted (facial expression) picture alone in a still too young age too. She is more Nordid but has obviously Dinarid and Mediterranid strains too, most likely some Alpinid as well, so a Central European mixture. In every case - her breasts look natural, dont know if she has implants. It would be interesting to see pictures of her parents and siblings. In the case of Casta that cleared it up finally and showed me that I was basically right.
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Dec 24, 2005 11:56:44 GMT -5
apparantly gisele has a non identical twin, although not sure what her name is
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Dec 24, 2005 12:09:07 GMT -5
Now all she needs is some hips. Thats the good thing, that she is not just very slim, almost skinny (borderline) but with good proportions, her waist-hip ratio is borderline ideal with almost 7:10. 7:10?? All I see is 99:100.
|
|
|
Post by nerdling301 on Dec 24, 2005 12:38:45 GMT -5
good Lord, judging from the before pics, i'm going to have to say she definitely has jewish admixture because of that schnozzz. catwoman, i had no idea she looked totally different before plastic surgery, that is utterly amazing. thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 24, 2005 12:41:37 GMT -5
Gisele looks more Jewish than murphee thats for sure since murphee looks 0% Armenoid in phenotype.
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Dec 24, 2005 12:49:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by catwoman on Dec 24, 2005 13:06:33 GMT -5
Thats the good thing, that she is not just very slim, almost skinny (borderline) but with good proportions, her waist-hip ratio is borderline ideal with almost 7:10. 7:10?? All I see is 99:100. agreed. But, I wager it's 1:1. How can they call her curvy/ voluptuous when she ahs absolutely no indentation at the waist. The curviest (natural) part of her body is that enormous gap between her thighs. I seriously don't understand how she can be touted as the most beautiful woman in the world. If's she's nothing special w/ makeup, photo editing, special lighting, and surgery, she must be pretty hard on the eyes au naturel. I see plenty of better looking women on the streets of Manhattan on a daily basis. I can't believe how ugly the beauty ideal has become. 10-15 years ago Cindy Crawford was the gold standard of supermodel beauty and it's not hard to see why. I think any man who finds Gisele's body attractive is either gay, a closeted homosexual, or one of those poor metrosexual fellows who's mind has been polluted by pop culture and the pages of Vogue Homme.
|
|
|
Post by stella22 on Dec 24, 2005 13:16:06 GMT -5
Gisele's W:H ratio looks like a .80. If you notice in her photos, she pushes her hips to the side to create some curve.
Gisele is famous because she has like 3% body fat. That is considered quite special these days.
Actually, I like her Noric face. At least she has a different ethnic look, not the same cookie cutter barbie face.
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Dec 24, 2005 13:30:55 GMT -5
Kudos to the photographer on this pic: The right side is kept dark, and left is illuminated, as she pushes her waist leftwards. Nice illusion. I stand by my opinion - she's practically a walking stick.
|
|