|
|
Post by zemelmete on Feb 1, 2006 7:41:56 GMT -5
ok my preference is women who are stacked in the back, and its black women I like the most because most are most are stacked in the back nicely. Its not about race´for me, its being stacked in the back. I have observed that males of african origin (like you) are attracted to women with big back. Here, in Europe, most males are attracted to women with small back. Why do euros and africans have so different (read - opposite) taste? |
|
|
|
Post by jam on Feb 1, 2006 8:07:16 GMT -5
Many white people like an certain amount of hips, and not a flat "back". Taste vary a lot, but little waist and wider hips (not huge hips) seems to be the "thing".
But these things aren't mutually exclusive at all.
The girl Planet Asia posted looks good, IMHO, although perhaps a bit too massive. But her shape looks good.
|
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Feb 1, 2006 9:13:57 GMT -5
southern Euro women have the best bods b/c they are a mixture. Mixture of what? Hasn't there been 2 million threads on Southern Europe on Dodona? Because of the geographic locale there is more of a mixture. Semetic,Arab, and other genes are intermingled in some of the people in parts of Southern Europe. Didn't the moderator here on Dodona say there was the highest admixture of african genes amongst Turkish and Portuguese?? |
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Feb 1, 2006 10:05:10 GMT -5
Hasn't there been 2 million threads on Southern Europe on Dodona? Because of the geographic locale there is more of a mixture. Semetic,Arab, and other genes are intermingled in some of the people in parts of Southern Europe. Didn't the moderator here on Dodona say there was the highest admixture of african genes amongst Turkish and Portuguese?? This explains everything |
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Feb 1, 2006 11:16:17 GMT -5
smug  |
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Feb 1, 2006 12:02:49 GMT -5
smug Yeah, must be all the intermingling with semetic and arab genes we south european turks have 'cause of the locale. A Dodona moderator said so in his last article on Scientific American. |
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Feb 1, 2006 12:29:29 GMT -5
My Austrian wife has a plump sub-Saharan posterior. Even black girls commented on how "black" her physique is--muscular and attractive, but curvy. She's purely Central European, and is in no way, shape or form "flat-bottomed" (although, strangely, the majority of her family are frog-bodied . . . especially the women: You know, big breasts, skinny legs, flat buttocks). Luckily my wife got the recessive genes and escaped all these curses.
|
|
brazen
Junior Member
Posts: 52
|
Post by brazen on Feb 1, 2006 13:35:35 GMT -5
I have noticed that southern Euro women do tend to have a little bit bigger backsides than North Euro women, but their backsides are generaly not as big as black womens blacksides. I think thats why a lot of latina women have big backsides, part of it is because some latinas are mixed with black but also because almost all latinas are mixed with southern Euro(Spanish). I do not believe that southern Euro women having a slightly larger backside than North Euro women is proof of them being mixed with anything, it's just a physical difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Feb 1, 2006 16:16:02 GMT -5
I can only speak for Spain and Portugal, but the women there tend to be slender and gracile. Think Penelope Cruz.
Obesity is anomalous, as are disproprtionately large bottoms.
Although I do agree: Mediterraneans have that "Mamma Effect" working against them. Up till the age of 30, Madonna [as an example] looked like a reasonably attractive woman. Past the age of 40, she turned into Ernest Borgnine.
She's exercising like a maniac to halt the accompanying girth, but you all know it's true: If she stopped the arobics for two months, she'd morph into a barrel-shaped Italian mamma.
|
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Feb 2, 2006 6:42:32 GMT -5
This what I'm talking about when i say stacked in the back and looking nice Thats class Though they rhyme, class is not quite the same as ass.  |
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Feb 2, 2006 20:06:11 GMT -5
I prefer smaller backs, but i certainly don't base my selection in ass size.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Feb 3, 2006 1:54:49 GMT -5
This what I'm talking about when i say stacked in the back and looking nice Thats class Though they rhyme, class is not quite the same as ass. No, I meant what I said, class. |
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Feb 3, 2006 2:35:49 GMT -5
I would probably engage in interracial relationships, but never in marriage or relations that would result in mixed-race children. That is my preference because: (a) I want my children to have a good deal of my looks, and (b) I don't want my wife or child to look like everyone else i.e. East/Southeast Asian (East being the norm in my city).
I am not against others having interracial marriages and children, I just believe that immigration controls should reduce the probability of that taking place. I don't believe multicultural/ethnic states work, and in the Aristotelian tradition, believe that ethnic homogeneity is crucial to the survival of a nation-state.
*NOTE: when everyone mixes, everyone will then look the same, with slight variations that will not match the great variation seen amongst the human race today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Feb 3, 2006 2:46:42 GMT -5
The look whereof Charlie is enamoured is one where the hips are relatively narrow and the buttocks protrude rearwards, this is accentuated by lordosis (spinal curvature c.f. Buff the body). Child bearing hips are wide and depending on the degree of lordosis may or may not appear to have large buttocks. Mediterranean women tend towards the classic hour-glass figure and have on average lordosis in between that of SSAs (great) and east Asiatics (minimal), so Charlie would surely find better bums in southern Europe than he ever might in Asia.   This what I'm talking about when i say stacked in the back and looking nice  Thats class Theirs nothing "classy" about a jutting sloppy fat ass with stretch marks ripping through the flesh(ie Jumbo getto booty) . Its disproportional and utterly repulsive-revolting. However Bass may be indeed fantasizing about Baboon's and their mating preferences and practices . |
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Feb 3, 2006 3:02:30 GMT -5
This what I'm talking about when i say stacked in the back and looking nice Thats class Theirs nothing "classy" about a jutting sloppy fat ass with stretch marks ripping through the flesh(ie Jumbo getto booty) . Its disproportional and utterly repulsive-revolting. However Bass may be indeed fantasizing about Baboon's and their mating preferences and practices . Flaming response from a babbling idiot who can't contribute to threads constructively. |
|
