|
Post by eufrenio on Dec 7, 2005 12:25:02 GMT -5
Idiamin is indeed a troll. I just banned him. You can read more of his wisdom at RAS forum. ;D
|
|
|
Post by ikilledjesus on Dec 7, 2005 17:19:31 GMT -5
remember, i live in Uganda. my name is idi amin.  western europe IS getting darker. why are you people getting angry?  Go hunt a zibra or something, troll
|
|
|
Post by Trog on Dec 7, 2005 19:04:13 GMT -5
If it happens, it won't be in your lifetime anyway. Besides, the odd "brownie" or "blackie" is either going to be absorbed, or the world will most probably descend into savagery. It will never happen. These "black" & "brown" people cannot control their own countries that are dominated by a very small elite, something which forces them to flee in the first place. Most non-European immigrants live in their own communities and with very little integration. Non-British does not equate to non-white. Since the Eastern block countries joined the Eu, they've been arriving in their thousands. Plus they also get the opportunity to live in any EU country quite freely without claiming asylum. From the moment they arrive on British soil, they are already in a position to prosper. Non-whites face a whole system of bureaucracy. As soon as Conservatives regain power, which they will do by the next election, the problem of immigration will be dealt with swiftly. r The Moors had little impact on southern Europe, despite an occupation that lasted 800 years. The Moors were defeated in the same spirit that has kept Europe strong, enduring two world wars in 30 years. She's still as strong as ever. And Indian Gypsies? Those poor, impoverished bastards ? We even have them in Scotland, but they're kept in camp sites very much like trailer trash in the States. There is no chastisement warranted by Europe. If any continent suffers appallingly, it is Africans. Nature and mankind have both been cruel to Africans. In all societies, the lightest group is the elite, the dominant factor. It will be the same even if "whites" are extinct. The lightest of what's left will occupy the top of the food chain. This is the way it is.
|
|
|
Post by ivyleak on Dec 7, 2005 19:17:46 GMT -5
In all societies, the lightest group is the elite, the dominant factor. It will be the same even if "whites" are extinct. The lightest of what's left will occupy the top of the food chain. This is the way it is. You are so right on the dollar. Because I am blonde I am always put in the position of leader of the pack. Sometimes I don't even want the responsiblility, but my darker friends just sort of nudge me into position. The clique I'm in is known as Lucille's clique.
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Dec 7, 2005 20:22:20 GMT -5
You are so right on the dollar. Because I am blonde I am always put in the position of leader of the pack. Sometimes I don't even want the responsiblility, but my darker friends just sort of nudge me into position. The clique I'm in is known as Lucille's clique. I am blonde also. I used to say that the cornerstone of world peace would be the extinction of what is known as 'White,' especially the blondes. I realized however, that if 'Whites' as we know them disappear from human society, then whoever's left will re-stratify themselves along colour lines and fight over who's 'Whiter' or closest to being 'White.' Blondes are like the white Siberian tiger: rare, prized, and hunted. Those features that humans find striking (blonde hair, light/coloured/mixed eyes, pale skin pigmentation), and phenotypic differentiation, are all found amongst 'Whites' in the majority and in the minority with all other racial groups.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 7, 2005 20:33:54 GMT -5
Wouldn't it be more likely if it was by IQ... as it is now?
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Dec 8, 2005 4:20:06 GMT -5
I was referring to phenotype...
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 8, 2005 12:27:39 GMT -5
I understand that... but phenotype doesn't seem to matter when taking into account IQ. And it appears that "leaders" whether it be in a clique or at work tend to have higher IQs. Personality traits may add or take away from a person's success but generally there is a hierarchy based on IQ and not phenotype.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 8, 2005 17:06:22 GMT -5
Bwahahaha. Is that a joke? becuase europe is one!
Those wars saw the end of the British Empire, the German Reich, Iconoclast Italy, The young and eager Polish state, France tried to stay as Important as it had been post WW1, but wasn't fooling anyone.
And of course this gave rise to global communism and global american imperiali..... I mean.. hegemony... which is still alive and kicking innocent asses. Both frankenstein nations essentially holding a gun to the head of the planet for 40 years. Yet europe is strong? Europe is weak and sickly in the literal sense and even more so in an ideological context.
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Dec 8, 2005 17:10:03 GMT -5
In all societies, the lightest group is the elite, the dominant factor. It will be the same even if "whites" are extinct. The lightest of what's left will occupy the top of the food chain. This is the way it is. You are so right on the dollar. Because I am blonde I am always put in the position of leader of the pack. Sometimes I don't even want the responsiblility, but my darker friends just sort of nudge me into position. The clique I'm in is known as Lucille's clique. lmao!
|
|
|
Post by dorlandt on Dec 8, 2005 17:10:51 GMT -5
i agree - white people, in archaic times, were usually european and thus more likely to have had formal education - especially in regards to the old white heterosexual male dominance. now that education is wide spread and people are more cultured and knowledgable of the advantages of it, its growing to be an un-white trait and people have stopped 'assuming' white skin to automatically denote a sound education coupled with fantastic leadership abilities (and stopped pressing their desire to denote those qualities with that 'look'). here in america where i study, blondes are considered to be 'stupid' and self-important. personally, i know i would never look up to anyone just because of their superficial phenotype, unless it made them like 7' tall (haha) 
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 8, 2005 17:26:30 GMT -5
You are so right on the dollar. Because I am blonde I am always put in the position of leader of the pack. Sometimes I don't even want the responsiblility, but my darker friends just sort of nudge me into position. The clique I'm in is known as Lucille's clique. I am blonde also. I used to say that the cornerstone of world peace would be the extinction of what is known as 'White,' especially the blondes. I realized however, that if 'Whites' as we know them disappear from human society, then whoever's left will re-stratify themselves along colour lines and fight over who's 'Whiter' or closest to being 'White.' Blondes are like the white Siberian tiger: rare, prized, and hunted. Those features that humans find striking (blonde hair, light/coloured/mixed eyes, pale skin pigmentation), and phenotypic differentiation, are all found amongst 'Whites' in the majority and in the minority with all other racial groups. It will be the complete opposite. The savage races of man must be liquidated for world peace (plus a few "civilized" religions), as prophesied by Charles Darwin: "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes… will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla" -- Charles Darwin; The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 8, 2005 17:32:20 GMT -5
I am blonde also. I used to say that the cornerstone of world peace would be the extinction of what is known as 'White,' especially the blondes. I realized however, that if 'Whites' as we know them disappear from human society, then whoever's left will re-stratify themselves along colour lines and fight over who's 'Whiter' or closest to being 'White.' Blondes are like the white Siberian tiger: rare, prized, and hunted. Those features that humans find striking (blonde hair, light/coloured/mixed eyes, pale skin pigmentation), and phenotypic differentiation, are all found amongst 'Whites' in the majority and in the minority with all other racial groups. It will be the complete opposite. The savage races of man must be liquidated for world peace (plus a few "civilized" religions), as prophesied by Charles Darwin: "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes… will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla" -- Charles Darwin; The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. .........I'm officially scared of you........ 
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 8, 2005 18:27:39 GMT -5
It will be the complete opposite. The savage races of man must be liquidated for world peace (plus a few "civilized" religions), as prophesied by Charles Darwin: "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes… will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla" -- Charles Darwin; The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. .........I'm officially scared of you........  It was Darwin's hypothesis, not mine. Even though I believe he's correct: World peace and savage races, (along with, IMO, religions that promote anti-world values.) cannot exist simultaneously, nor can policy, as dictated by religion, be one and the same with "reason". Since these religions are the anti-thesis of reason; wholly apart from reality, resembling autism, rather than rational thought. By the way, who said I was in favor of world peace? The worlds a struggle. Without bad, what good would good be? It's a value symptomatic of slave morality, as is being frightened by Charles Darwin.
|
|
|
Post by atlantis on Dec 8, 2005 19:10:55 GMT -5
|
|