|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 3:09:28 GMT -5
This seems to be the latest chapter in the ongoing saga of Medits and Medophiles creating fake cultures and subraces to make claims once again that they can't back up.
|
|
|
Post by blueskygod on Jan 18, 2006 4:38:34 GMT -5
I think a Medit culture is the best culture. End of discussion!
|
|
|
Post by blueskygod on Jan 18, 2006 4:42:39 GMT -5
and even if the africans had one civilisation, eurasians had thousands. muahahahahahahahaa
|
|
|
Post by blueskygod on Jan 18, 2006 4:44:10 GMT -5
besides egypt was conquered by greece, hahaha. like cleopatra was greek. greece rules man nuff said. i wont post anymore. iv won!
|
|
|
Post by wendland on Jan 19, 2006 1:39:23 GMT -5
All of the Modern "Western"and Islamic (The Americas, Europe, West Asia) worlds have a "medit" culture at their roots: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, not to mention ties to Greece, Rome, Egypt, Mesopotamia. So, this "medit" culture goes much farther than the Mediterranean to encompass large parts of the globe.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 19, 2006 2:25:10 GMT -5
None of this answers my question at all, what the heck is a "Medit Caucasoid Culture", this is just all jibberish.
|
|
|
Post by Dienekes on Jan 19, 2006 3:45:52 GMT -5
There exists no single "Mediterranean Caucasoid Culture". It is better to speak of cultures of the Mediterranean interaction zone which definitely share common elements through their descent from Neolithic agriculturalists of the Fertile Crescent and their subsequent interactions in prehistory and history.
We should note that the cultures of the Mediterranean interaction zone are indeed related by a common descent (from the Neolithic of West Asia), and by subsequent interactions. This is quite unlike the case of e.g., other geographical regions such as Asia or Africa, where such unity of descent and interaction simply does not exist.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 19, 2006 3:49:28 GMT -5
There exists no single "Mediterranean Caucasoid Culture". It is better to speak of cultures of the Mediterranean interaction zone which definitely share common elements through their descent from Neolithic agriculturalists of the Fertile Crescent and their subsequent interactions in prehistory and history. We should note that the cultures of the Mediterranean interaction zone are indeed related by a common descent (from the Neolithic of West Asia), and by subsequent interactions. This is quite unlike the case of e.g., other geographical regions such as Asia or Africa, where such unity of descent and interaction simply does not exist. There is no one common Medit unity. As i pointed out with my proof in the other thread concerning Egypt for example, it was a civilization that sprang from Nilotic and Saharan cultural traditions from the South in Egypt and has nothing significantly in common with Greece, Rome, Sumeria or Babylon.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 19, 2006 3:52:35 GMT -5
Add to that the fact that the Natufians were sub-Saharan influenced skelatally and culturally and you cannot leave Africa out of the equation.
|
|
|
Post by kwalka on Jan 19, 2006 4:08:53 GMT -5
medit culture = drinking wine and eating olives
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 22, 2006 11:30:03 GMT -5
lol
|
|
tikitorch
Junior Member
The Mediterranean has the color of mackerel, changeable I mean. You don't always know if it is green
Posts: 53
|
Post by tikitorch on Jan 22, 2006 11:31:33 GMT -5
medit culture = drinking wine and eating olives You can add homosexuality to that also. That's a lie. I'm not a homo and either is my friends.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 22, 2006 11:35:21 GMT -5
lol
|
|
tikitorch
Junior Member
The Mediterranean has the color of mackerel, changeable I mean. You don't always know if it is green
Posts: 53
|
Post by tikitorch on Jan 22, 2006 11:44:00 GMT -5
That's a lie. I'm not a homo and either is my friends. Homosexuality is more common in southern Europe, the so-called medit region, than in the rest of Europe. Not all Medits are homos, if that were true metrosensual would be living there, but still homosexuality is very common in southern Europe. I think you lie. What about being bi-curious? Does this mean homo. Some of my friends are bi-curious.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 22, 2006 11:47:02 GMT -5
Homosexuality is more common in southern Europe, the so-called medit region, than in the rest of Europe. Not all Medits are homos, if that were true metrosensual would be living there, but still homosexuality is very common in southern Europe. I think you lie. What about being bi-curious? Does this mean homo. Some of my friends are bi-curious. Anything not straight is homosexual.
|
|