|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 15, 2006 6:11:48 GMT -5
LOL! Egypt was a Mediterranean Civilzation and always considered itself part've Asia . Ancient Egypt was an African civilization built with influences on African soil by Africans in Africa. Egypyt didn't bloom becuase of black "high-culture", egypt collapsed becuase of black influence.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 6:25:49 GMT -5
Ancient Egypt was an African civilization built with influences on African soil by Africans in Africa. Egypyt didn't bloom becuase of black "high-culture", egypt collapsed becuase of black influence. Racist nonsense, Egyptian civilization was full of "black" influence since its inception, get your nose from out of Arthur kemp's butt.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 15, 2006 7:34:40 GMT -5
Ancient Egypt was an African civilization built with influences on African soil by Africans in Africa. Egypyt didn't bloom becuase of black "high-culture", egypt collapsed becuase of black influence. yeah, and it bloomed because of the contribution of invading blonds from the north right?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 8:03:37 GMT -5
Egypyt didn't bloom becuase of black "high-culture", egypt collapsed becuase of black influence. yeah, and it bloomed because of the contribution of invading blonds from the north right? People whom we would call white Germanic Nordic looking types that Arthur Kemp swears were the ruling class were rare in ancient Egypt and almost none looked like Europeans. Medophiles aside who think that Arab looking Europeans are just as white as Nords, ancient Egypt had very little if any white people there.
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 15, 2006 9:00:05 GMT -5
i cant believe this guy thought that nordic blondes existed in ancient egypt...LMAO
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 15, 2006 9:35:44 GMT -5
whats even more laughable is the notion of putting northern europeans in any ancient context. They entered the world scence some hundred years ago. The egyptians were not europeans, and looked nothing like most europeans. Egypt was strictly an african civilization with influx of people from the levant in some cases from southern europe. But mostly africans and people from middle-east, (regardles if they looked closer to the so called caucasian or not)so in conclusion Egypt was an African civilization which later became an afro-asiatic civilization, founded by the badarian and naqada who have been proven by brace study to be indeginious north east africans, and had the same craniometric shape as those living in the nile valley and horn of africa today.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 9:40:52 GMT -5
whats even more laughable is the notion of putting northern europeans in any ancient context. They entered the world scence some hundred years ago. The egyptians were not europeans, and looked nothing like most europeans. Egypt was strictly an african civilization with influx of people from the levant in some cases from southern europe. But mostly africans and people from middle-east, (regardles if they looked closer to the so called caucasian or not)so in conclusion Egypt was an African civilization which later became an afro-asiatic civilization, founded by the badarian and naqada who have been proven by brace study to be indeginious north east africans, and had the same craniometric shape as those living in the nile valley and horn of africa today. NOTE: Brace only studied Naqadans and Late Dynastic Egyptians, but no Badarians who are even more "Negroid" than Naqadans.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 15, 2006 9:48:54 GMT -5
whats even more laughable is the notion of putting northern europeans in any ancient context. They entered the world scence some hundred years ago. The egyptians were not europeans, and looked nothing like most europeans. Egypt was strictly an african civilization with influx of people from the levant in some cases from southern europe. But mostly africans and people from middle-east, (regardles if they looked closer to the so called caucasian or not)so in conclusion Egypt was an African civilization which later became an afro-asiatic civilization, founded by the badarian and naqada who have been proven by brace study to be indeginious north east africans, and had the same craniometric shape as those living in the nile valley and horn of africa today. NOTE: Brace only studied Naqadans and Late Dynastic Egyptians, but no Badarians who are even more "Negroid" than Naqadans. True, you're right, but I assumed both Naqada and badarian were very close to each other.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 9:53:43 GMT -5
NOTE: Brace only studied Naqadans and Late Dynastic Egyptians, but no Badarians who are even more "Negroid" than Naqadans. True, you're right, but I assumed both Naqada and badarian were very close to each other. They were closely related to each other and both were more closely related to Nubians and peoples of the Horn than to any Europeans or so-called "Medits".
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 10:40:16 GMT -5
Kimaryo, Jacob L. (2000), East African Coastal Historical Towns: Asiatic or African? A Paper Presented at the Conference: U-landsforskning 2000, January 13-15, 2000, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.
EAST AFRICAN COASTAL HISTORICAL TOWNS Asiatic or African? by Jacob L. Kimaryo
Abstract:
The East African coast is dotted with ruined and extant historical towns of significant cultural importance. Albeit the builders and inhabitants of these towns are known to have been the Swahili, who these historic people were in terms of their origin has been a matter of serious debate since the beginning of the 20th century. So far two perspectives have emerged out of this debate, which respectively advocate for Asiatic and African ancestries of the historic Swahili. This paper makes a critical review of the two perspectives about the founders and dwellers of East African coastal historical towns. The review shows that the Asiatic perspective is based on the colonial deliberate falsification of African history, and to certain extents limited historical understanding about the East African coast. The African perspective on the contrary, is founded on credible evidence from historical records and recent archaeological findings and interpretations. The evidence strongly suggests that historical Swahili people are descendants of Bantu and Cushitic speaking people who settled along the East African coast in the first millennium. These Africans are believed to have attained a common cultural and linguistic base hence became Swahili per se around the 11th century through the medium of Islam. This cultural and linguistic transformation is believed to have originated in Shungwaya alias Shirazi in the northern coast of Kenya from where it spread southwards to the rest of the East African coast. To conclude, the review shows that although some non-Africans particularly Arabs and Persians were absorbed into Swahili population over the different historical epochs of the East African coast, historic Swahili people remained decidedly African in ancestry and culture.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 15, 2006 10:47:55 GMT -5
Egypyt didn't bloom becuase of black "high-culture", egypt collapsed becuase of black influence. yeah, and it bloomed because of the contribution of invading blonds from the north right? No. It had because of the North African Mediterranean overlords.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 10:51:46 GMT -5
yeah, and it bloomed because of the contribution of invading blonds from the north right? No. It had because of the North African Mediterranean overlords. You must be smkoing dope!
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 15, 2006 11:16:28 GMT -5
now ancient egypt may not have been filled with sudanid bantu nigerians, but it certainely wasnt full of people looking like germans or even italians for that matter. infact it was probably a mixture of peoples ranging from what modern day egyptians look like today, to somali esque complection/facial morphology - also there would have been people with nubian ancestry too. prehaps the majority looked like eritreans - with tanned skin, elongated face shapes and hard but not nappy hair that could grow long and curly. eg www.inmagine.com/thumbnails/bilderlounge/bl003/010265bl.jpg
|
|
|
Post by maniac on Jan 15, 2006 12:30:48 GMT -5
It's hard to agree with you gelaye because if the majority of people in AE looked like the girl you posted above, modern egyptians would be better looking.
|
|
zapp
New Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by zapp on Jan 15, 2006 15:17:09 GMT -5
^^white woman and a bunch of delta egyptians yeah they look so the same... NOT
|
|