|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 17:16:15 GMT -5
A homosexual goes to Africa on vacation and by chance sees two chimps engaging in homosexual sex? I'm not threatened by Jews and please stop with the liberal and Jews laden claptrap. Claptrap? Anything I've posted is absolutely true. Most people believe coincidence doesn't happen but actually, they actually DO happen sometimes! Homosexuality being common and normal in the animal kingdom is most certainly not absolutely true. Can you post anything without homosexual political agenda on your mind. |
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 20:37:43 GMT -5
Claptrap? Anything I've posted is absolutely true. Most people believe coincidence doesn't happen but actually, they actually DO happen sometimes! Homosexuality being common and normal in the animal kingdom is most certainly not absolutely true. Can you post anything without homosexual political agenda on your mind. Can you post anything without being a homophobic, biased cunt? |
|
byz
Full Member
rodostamo na ginesai
Posts: 171
|
Post by byz on Dec 26, 2005 20:39:49 GMT -5
Claptrap? Anything I've posted is absolutely true. Most people believe coincidence doesn't happen but actually, they actually DO happen sometimes! Homosexuality being common and normal in the animal kingdom is most certainly not absolutely true. Can you post anything without homosexual political agenda on your mind. Um, go to school, read a book - homosexuality is common and normal in the animal kingdom. |
|
|
|
Post by psychosemitic on Dec 27, 2005 0:41:40 GMT -5
Homosexuality being common and normal in the animal kingdom is most certainly not absolutely true. Can you post anything without homosexual political agenda on your mind. Um, go to school, read a book - homosexuality is common and normal in the animal kingdom. well i have to agree, i learned that in school, mamals frequently engage in non reproductive sexual behaviour indiscriminate to the sex of the animal, however we are humans not animals many things are natural in the animal kingdom that are forbiden by god |
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Dec 30, 2005 17:58:32 GMT -5
my goodness can this argument stop - its pretty obvious that decadence isn't here for a discussion, he's here to preach and not willing to accept anybodys opinions - decadence i respect your beliefs etc but what is the point you are trying to make?
|
|
Bryce
Full Member
Posts: 206
|
Post by Bryce on Jan 14, 2006 13:07:16 GMT -5
If I had children, I would tell them as early as possible, in chosen terms, both simple and technical, what homosexuality and heterosexuality are.
I would tell them that male homosexuals are appalled by the thought of having sex with grown women but can occasionally feel desire for little girls or very young female teen-agers, and that even if their preference goes rather to male grownups, their lust for pre-adolescent and adolescent boys is unquenchable and can drive them to commit outright rape, or to be more subtle and be very patient and gradually talk their chosen victims into accepting sexual intercourses.
But I would also talk to them about political correctness and societal decay, and tell them to be not only cautious against sexual predators, but also against moral lepers who tell us what to think, hence to avoid speaking to anyone about my warnings.
I would act so not because I underwent abuse or know persons who underwent this abomination, but because this is my personal ingrained conception of gayness, because I just like to think that.
|
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 14, 2006 15:54:41 GMT -5
and would you tell them of grown heterosexual men who have a prefernce for grown females, who also LUST for adolescent teenage girls which can drive them to commit rape ''and be very patient and gradually talk their chosen victims into accepting sexual intercourses.''
|
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jan 14, 2006 16:09:36 GMT -5
Gelaye, precisely
If a 35 years old man sleeps with a 14 years old girl, no one says, that man is not straight! he is just a pederast! Because it would be ridiculous
But if a 35 years old priest sleeps with a 14 years old boy, Homosexuals go, no, he was not a homosexual, he was just a pederast or pedophile!
thats bullshit
I remember a case here wherea priest forced a 14 years old kid (who looked almost adult) to penetrate him, and the homosexuals were saying it was not gay rape, just pedophilia.
|
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Jan 14, 2006 21:33:41 GMT -5
No, it's a way of life that I'm born with, just as you're born with your heterosexuality. You like straight sex, I like gay sex. Simple. Haven't you heard? Fundamentalists don't have sex because they fear it.  |
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 14, 2006 21:57:29 GMT -5
I'm still confused by the definition of "fundementalists" as anything other than follower of the basic and essential teachings. If it's about a specific religion--why not just name it.
|
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Jan 14, 2006 22:47:45 GMT -5
Fundamentalists are revisionists. They aren't about essential teachings but rather claiming essentialism using dogma that leans towards literalism and promotes supremacy in a politically active manner. Religions change as times change. Fundamentalists reject social growth and progress. In this thread I use the term because they get bent out of shape about sex. Islamicists seek martyrdom and seventy virgins in paradise. I always wondered if this had something to do with insecurities or because they simply have no idea how to be passionate, how to love in a physical way. Christian types in America are sooo ashamed about sex. So there's two names right there. In all cases, they attempt to control women by denegrating human female sexuality and codifying proscriptions against it. Anyone that cares who's gay can't possibly be taking care of business for themselves. If they were they'd be too busy enjoying themselves to care what anyone else does. |
|
|
|
Post by oubit on Jan 15, 2006 15:32:31 GMT -5
If I had children, I would tell them as early as possible, in chosen terms, both simple and technical, what homosexuality and heterosexuality are. I would tell them that male homosexuals are appalled by the thought of having sex with grown women but can occasionally feel desire for little girls or very young female teen-agers (...) Hm? What kind of BS is that?  |
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 15, 2006 15:36:07 GMT -5
If I had children, I would tell them as early as possible, in chosen terms, both simple and technical, what homosexuality and heterosexuality are. I would tell them that male homosexuals are appalled by the thought of having sex with grown women but can occasionally feel desire for little girls or very young female teen-agers (...) Hm? What kind of BS is that? that doesnt make any sense. that means they are bisexual paedophiles not gay paedophiles. straight paedophiles go for young girls, gay paedophiles go for young boys. thats simple. |
|
|
|
Post by oubit on Jan 15, 2006 15:41:37 GMT -5
If a 35 years old man sleeps with a 14 years old girl, no one says, that man is not straight! he is just a pederast! Actually, there doesn't seem to be a special term for it (pederasty refers to males only, but seems to be one the words that are corrupted by modern mass media). I guess because there are just too many heterosexual men, who would be interested in that, so they don't give themselves a new label. |
|
Bryce
Full Member
Posts: 206
|
Post by Bryce on Jan 26, 2006 7:22:13 GMT -5
BS, said he…
Agreed!
I write and say profuse quantities of bullshit, because I'm a totally shameless and unrepentant hick, male chauvinist, Western supremacist, homophobic, provincial, with little interest if not outright disgust for certain cultures and languages.
Why do I suddenly give vent so openly to my opinions? Because, on the 30th of December, 2005, something happened to me. I had a brain vascular accident. Its effects were transient and I'm apparently all right now but my future has changed, my life-expectancy has been hewn. And I have become totally free of any concern for others' opinion on my self and for others' feelings.
|
|
