|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 15:56:03 GMT -5
OH MY GOD. Are you some white supremist f uck or something? 99.9% of politicians are heterosexual and quick to expel any radicals for any cause. Homosexuality DOES NOT INCREASE HIV/AIDS, that's just some stupid thought from the 80's when AIDS was on the increase (the vagina is an orifice too, idiot). Heterosexuality has a bigger part to play in the spread of AIDS because most AIDS has been spread through heterosexual intercourse. Also, HIV/AIDS is spreading just as quickly amongst white Americans too but you're probably too ashamed to admit it. Think about it, heterosexual sex results in procreation. The millions of HIV positive of kids in Africa and beyond were the product of HETEROSEXUAL relationships. Explain that with your 'homosexuals spread AIDS' shit. Cunt. A white male homosexual brought HIV/AIDS to America. If homosexual sex was eliminated there would be a significant decrease STD transmission. Gay sex has even bigger health consequences. www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.htmlIntravenous drug using mothers make up the bigger percentage of mothers that pass HIV to their unborn babies than mothers who contracted HIV through heterosexual sex. I don't give two f ucks about that stupid, clearly religion-based 'medically' evidenced site. It's BULLSHIT. And your claim about mothers is BULLSHIT too. You're telling me that poor Africans living well below the poverty line can afford IV drugs? Don't be f ucking stupid. Plus, maybe AIDS did come to the States via a homosexual, but the first people to be affected by AIDS were Africans via WHO needles. And who's to say that it could've been spread just as easily by an African heterosexual immigrant to the States? www.stanford.edu/class/stat30/web1/aids2.html
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 16:01:39 GMT -5
A white male homosexual brought HIV/AIDS to America. If homosexual sex was eliminated there would be a significant decrease STD transmission. Gay sex has even bigger health consequences. www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.htmlIntravenous drug using mothers make up the bigger percentage of mothers that pass HIV to their unborn babies than mothers who contracted HIV through heterosexual sex. I don't give two f ucks about that stupid, clearly religion-based 'medically' evidenced site. It's BULLSHIT. And your claim about mothers is BULLSHIT too. You're telling me that poor Africans living well below the poverty line can afford IV drugs? Don't be f ucking stupid. Plus, maybe AIDS did come to the States via a homosexual, but the first people to be affected by AIDS were Africans via WHO needles. And who's to say that it could've been spread just as easily by an African heterosexual immigrant to the States? www.stanford.edu/class/stat30/web1/aids2.htmlHomosexual politically driven claptrap is bullshit, you're in denial big time buddy. If it wasn't for a homosexual there would be no HIV/AIDS in the United States. Homosexuals were the main vectors instrumental in spreading this deadly plague.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 16:09:41 GMT -5
I don't give two f ucks about that stupid, clearly religion-based 'medically' evidenced site. It's BULLSHIT. And your claim about mothers is BULLSHIT too. You're telling me that poor Africans living well below the poverty line can afford IV drugs? Don't be f ucking stupid. Plus, maybe AIDS did come to the States via a homosexual, but the first people to be affected by AIDS were Africans via WHO needles. And who's to say that it could've been spread just as easily by an African heterosexual immigrant to the States? www.stanford.edu/class/stat30/web1/aids2.htmlHomosexual politically driven claptrap is bullshit, you're in denial big time buddy. If it wasn't for a homosexual there would be no HIV/AIDS in the United States. Homosexuals were the main vectors instrumental in spreading this deadly plague. No, your claptrap is bullshit dear. If it wasn't for a HETEROSEXUAL man, AIDS would never have been on this Earth and that man is ultimately the cause of HIV/AIDS everywhere and heterosexual couples have just as big a part if not a bigger part to play in the spread of this epidemic because they are the MAJORITY. It seem's your the one in denial. I mean, you used African Americans as scapegoats to the spread of AIDS in white America. How in denial is that, bastard? (Oh, and for lower beings like yourself, that last question was rhetoric.) 'When Did AIDS Begin? Reprinted from Times Magazine, By Christine Gorman Spring 1998 A new study of the oldest known HIV suggests the virus jumped from animals to humans in the 1940s. The year was 1959, location: The central African city of Leopoldville, now called Kinshasa, shortly before the waves of violent rebellion that followed the liberation of the Belgian Congo. A seemingly healthy heterosexual man walked into a hospital clinic to give blood for a Western backed study of blood diseases. He walked away and was never heard from again. Doctors analyzed his sample, froze it in a test tube and forgot about it. A quarter-century later, in the mid-1980s, researchers studying the growing AIDS epidemic took a second look at the blood and discovered that it contained HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. And not just any HIV. The Leopoldville sample is the oldest specimen of the AIDS virus ever isolated and may now help solve the mystery of how and when the virus made the leap from animals (monkeys or chimpanzees) to humans, according to a report published last week in Nature. Dr. David Ho, director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York City and one of the study's authors, says a careful genetic analysis of the sample's DNA pushes the origin of the AIDS epidemic back at least a decade, to the early '50s or even the '40s. Over the past 15 years, scientists have identified at least 10 subtypes of the virus. But they couldn't tell whether they were seeing variations on one changeable virus or the handiwork of several different viruses that had made the jump from primates to man. A look at the genetic mutations in the Leopoldville sample strongly suggests that all it took to launch the epidemic was one unlucky turn of events. By comparing the DNA of the 1959 virus with that of samples taken from the '80s and '90s. Ho and his colleagues constructed a viral family tree in which the Leopoldville isolate sits right at the juncture where three subtypes branch out. The 39-year-old specimen is also strikingly similar to the other seven subtypes. The clear implication: all the viral strains can be traced back to a single event or a closely related group of events. One theory is that AIDS started through contact with infected monkeys in a remote area and spread to the rest of the population through urbanization and mass inoculations. The findings underscore how rapidly HIV can adapt to its surroundings, making it difficult to develop effective vaccines. No one knows how many more subtypes of HIV will sprout in the next 40 years, but chances are they will be every bit as lethal as the ones we see today, if not more so.'
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 16:13:49 GMT -5
Homosexual politically driven claptrap is bullshit, you're in denial big time buddy. If it wasn't for a homosexual there would be no HIV/AIDS in the United States. Homosexuals were the main vectors instrumental in spreading this deadly plague. No, your 'claptrap' is bullshit dear. If it wasn't for a HETEROSEXUAL Gay sex is high risk and spreads diesease and germs more easily from person to person. Rectal sex, rimming and golding showers are linchpins of gay sex, its extremely unhygenic. The rectal cavity is for taking a shit buddy and you wipe afterwards to remove the germs. Rectal sex spread germs. Homosexuals engage in oral sex more than heterosexuals, so yes, your lifestyle is well suited to spread disease.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 16:19:19 GMT -5
No, your 'claptrap' is bullshit dear. If it wasn't for a HETEROSEXUAL Gay sex is high risk and spreads diesease and germs more easily from person to person. Rectal sex, rimming and golding showers are linchpins of gay sex, its extremely unhygenic. The rectal cavity is for taking a shit buddy and you wipe afterwards to remove the germs. Rectal sex spread germs. Homosexuals engage in oral sex more than heterosexuals, so yes, your lifestyle is well suited to spread disease. ERGHHHH...you're so f ucking incorrigible. I'm pretty shocked that you know homo terms - you've just cemented the fact that you're closeted. Do you search up gay porn or something??? Anyways, the overhwelming majority of homosexuals in Western countries use condoms nowadays (FACT). Considering that heterosexuals make up the majority of society, oral sex is overwhelmingly more practiced in heterosexual relationships, and you know that's the reality. Also, many heterosexuals engage in anal sex and as they are again, the overwhelming majority - maybe it's more practiced by heterosexuals in sheer number (very, very believable). These days, with increased sexual adventurous activity on EVERYONE'S part, maybe we're all increasingly vulnerable to spreading disease.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 16:25:07 GMT -5
Gay sex is high risk and spreads diesease and germs more easily from person to person. Rectal sex, rimming and golding showers are linchpins of gay sex, its extremely unhygenic. The rectal cavity is for taking a shit buddy and you wipe afterwards to remove the germs. Rectal sex spread germs. Homosexuals engage in oral sex more than heterosexuals, so yes, your lifestyle is well suited to spread disease. ERGHHHH...you're so f ucking incorrigible. I'm pretty shocked that you know homo terms - you've just cemented the fact that you're closeted. Do you search up gay porn or something??? Anyways, the overhwelming majority of homosexuals in Western countries use condoms nowadays (FACT). Considering that heterosexuals make up the majority of society, oral sex is overwhelmingly more practiced in heterosexual relationships, and you know that's the reality. Also, many heterosexuals engage in anal sex and as they are again, the overwhelming majority - maybe it's more practiced by heterosexuals in sheer number (very, very believable). These days, with increased sexual adventurous activity on EVERYONE'S part, maybe we're all increasingly vulnerable to spreading disease. Homosexuals engage in anal sex more than heterosexuals because anal sex in the only way to go for homosexuals, so its much more prevalent in homosexuals. I don't look at gay porn or pornography at all. Please do not patronise me with homosexuality. Homosexual sex is mostly unprotected(FACT) and rectal sex is still high risk even with condoms so gay sex is clearly suited for disease and destruction.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 16:34:12 GMT -5
ERGHHHH...you're so f ucking incorrigible. I'm pretty shocked that you know homo terms - you've just cemented the fact that you're closeted. Do you search up gay porn or something??? Anyways, the overhwelming majority of homosexuals in Western countries use condoms nowadays (FACT). Considering that heterosexuals make up the majority of society, oral sex is overwhelmingly more practiced in heterosexual relationships, and you know that's the reality. Also, many heterosexuals engage in anal sex and as they are again, the overwhelming majority - maybe it's more practiced by heterosexuals in sheer number (very, very believable). These days, with increased sexual adventurous activity on EVERYONE'S part, maybe we're all increasingly vulnerable to spreading disease. Homosexuals engage in anal sex more than heterosexuals because anal sex in the only way to go for homosexuals, so its much more prevalent in homosexuals. I don't look at gay porn or pornography at all. Please do not patronise me with homosexuality. Homosexual sex is mostly unprotected(FACT) and rectal sex is still high risk even with condoms so gay sex is clearly suited for disease and destruction. Oh, for once. Please, just do this for me........................... .................................................................................................................................................................................. Shut the f uck and die. Please. Oh would you please. I'll continue to patronise you because you're a stupid idiot. AIDS is overwheliming prevalent in heterosexuals worldwide (FACT). Western (I said Western before, shithead) homosexuals mostly use condoms and you must be soooooo stupid because using a good quality condom reduces the risk of anal sex to zero. Gay sex is not intended for disease and destruction. Are you saying that heterosexual couples in let's say the Mozambique don't bring death and destruction by procreating 15-20 HIV positive children that will live on to procreate more diseased children? It's a vicious circle. And with that, I believe I've won.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 16:39:51 GMT -5
Homosexuals engage in anal sex more than heterosexuals because anal sex in the only way to go for homosexuals, so its much more prevalent in homosexuals. I don't look at gay porn or pornography at all. Please do not patronise me with homosexuality. Homosexual sex is mostly unprotected(FACT) and rectal sex is still high risk even with condoms so gay sex is clearly suited for disease and destruction. Oh, for once. Please, just do this for me........................... .................................................................................................................................................................................. Shut the f uck and die. Please. Oh would you please. I'll continue to patronise you because you're a stupid idiot. AIDS is overwheliming prevalent in heterosexuals worldwide (FACT). Western (I said Western before, shithead) homosexuals mostly use condoms and you must be soooooo stupid because using a good quality condom reduces the risk of anal sex to zero. Gay sex is not intended for disease and destruction. Are you saying that heterosexual couples in let's say the Mozambique don't bring death and destruction by procreating 15-20 HIV positive children that will live on to procreate more diseased children? It's a vicious circle. And with that, I believe I've won. Homosexuality and gay sex spread HIV/AIDS much more rapidly than heterosexual sex. HIV/AIDS in Africa is different because the disease was started by bad use of needles. Africans are still mostly unaware about the dangers of AIDS in contrast to Western homosexuals who know the dangers yet still continue to engage in rectal sex. Don't patronise me with homosexual advances.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 16:42:40 GMT -5
Oh, for once. Please, just do this for me........................... .................................................................................................................................................................................. Shut the f uck and die. Please. Oh would you please. I'll continue to patronise you because you're a stupid idiot. AIDS is overwheliming prevalent in heterosexuals worldwide (FACT). Western (I said Western before, shithead) homosexuals mostly use condoms and you must be soooooo stupid because using a good quality condom reduces the risk of anal sex to zero. Gay sex is not intended for disease and destruction. Are you saying that heterosexual couples in let's say the Mozambique don't bring death and destruction by procreating 15-20 HIV positive children that will live on to procreate more diseased children? It's a vicious circle. And with that, I believe I've won. Homosexuality and gay sex spread HIV/AIDS much more rapidly than heterosexual sex. HIV/AIDS in Africa is different because the disease was started by bad use of needles. Africans are still mostly unaware about the dangers of AIDS in contrast to Western homosexuals who know the dangers yet still continue to engage in rectal sex. Don't patronise me with homosexual advances. Shut up. Actually, the BBC did a segment on this last week on 'HardTalk' and actually mentioned that the rates of HIV and AIDS has fallen rapidly in homosexuals since 1995 wherease the increase is occurring in young heterosexual couples. It seems as though we've learnt. On the other hand, you have not.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 16:49:41 GMT -5
Homosexuality and gay sex spread HIV/AIDS much more rapidly than heterosexual sex. HIV/AIDS in Africa is different because the disease was started by bad use of needles. Africans are still mostly unaware about the dangers of AIDS in contrast to Western homosexuals who know the dangers yet still continue to engage in rectal sex. Don't patronise me with homosexual advances. Shut up. Actually, the BBC did a segment on this last week on 'HardTalk' and actually mentioned that the rates of HIV and AIDS has fallen rapidly in homosexuals since 1995 wherease the increase is occurring in young heterosexual couples. It seems as though we've learnt. On the other hand, you have not. The BBC is controlled by Jews and liberals want to advance the notion that homosexuality isn't dangerous. The Jews likes to use people to carry out their murderous agendas. Its much more safe to be a heterosexual than to be homosexuals because life starts and continues on with us and comes to a dead end with homosexuality. Either way, homosexuality reduces human life.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 16:53:24 GMT -5
Shut up. Actually, the BBC did a segment on this last week on 'HardTalk' and actually mentioned that the rates of HIV and AIDS has fallen rapidly in homosexuals since 1995 wherease the increase is occurring in young heterosexual couples. It seems as though we've learnt. On the other hand, you have not. The BBC is controlled by Jews and liberals want to advance the notion that homosexuality isn't dangerous. The Jews likes to use people to carry out their murderous agendas. Its much more safe to be a heterosexual than to be homosexuals because life starts and continues on with us and comes to a dead end with homosexuality. Either way, homosexuality reduces human life. 'Either way homosexuality reduces human life' Which is exactly what we need to stabilise the uncontrollable population! Plus, the BBC is not controlled by Jews, idiot. It's a Government - run public corporation. The British Govt. is not Jewish. Don't apply American home affairs to British politics. Doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 17:05:03 GMT -5
The BBC is controlled by Jews and liberals want to advance the notion that homosexuality isn't dangerous. The Jews likes to use people to carry out their murderous agendas. Its much more safe to be a heterosexual than to be homosexuals because life starts and continues on with us and comes to a dead end with homosexuality. Either way, homosexuality reduces human life. 'Either way homosexuality reduces human life' Which is exactly what we need to stabilise the uncontrollable population! Plus, the BBS is not controlled by Jews, idiot. It's a Government - run public corporation. The British Govt. is not Jewish. Don't apply American home affairs to British politics. Doesn't work. Are you saying homosexuality is needed to stabilize the "uncontrollable" world population? Please don't patronize the majority hetereosexual population with your political homosexual claptrap.
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 17:06:46 GMT -5
'Either way homosexuality reduces human life' Which is exactly what we need to stabilise the uncontrollable population! Plus, the BBS is not controlled by Jews, idiot. It's a Government - run public corporation. The British Govt. is not Jewish. Don't apply American home affairs to British politics. Doesn't work. Are you saying homosexuality is needed to stabilize the "uncontrollable" world population? Please don't patronize the majority hetereosexual population with your political homosexual claptrap. Well, we need something. All other initiatives have failed miserably.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 17:09:13 GMT -5
Are you saying homosexuality is needed to stabilize the "uncontrollable" world population? Please don't patronize the majority hetereosexual population with your political homosexual claptrap. Well, we need something. All other initiatives have failed miserably. And homosexuality is the other initiative? LMFAO!!
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 17:10:25 GMT -5
Well, we need something. All other initiatives have failed miserably. And homosexuality is the other initiative? LMFAO!! Not an initiaive but a factor, bitch
|
|