|
Post by ikilledjesus on Dec 26, 2005 8:30:54 GMT -5
Homosexuality is a perverted mentally retarded concept, keep it for yourself, if you dont, at least do something useful and give abdul/yigal aids. ;D
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Dec 26, 2005 8:33:16 GMT -5
Look, you people than condone homosexuality have God to answer to, not me. I don't care about homosexuality and don't care to discuss it. Haha so I'll have to answer to God for what I type here, well I'll be damned...I didnt know Dodona posts counted towards my salvation. Can I confess? Our Father, who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name. Im here to confess a sin for I have trespassed against Your will and lead to temptation forgive me my Lord for posting on Dodona and succumbing to that evil serpent, "Logic" amen
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Dec 26, 2005 8:41:04 GMT -5
Look, you people than condone homosexuality have God to answer to, not me. I don't care about homosexuality and don't care to discuss it. Haha so I'll have to answer to God for what I type here, well I'll be damned...I didnt know Dodona posts counted towards my salvation. Can I confess? Our Father, who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name. Im here to confess a sin for I have trespassed against Your will and lead to temptation forgive me my Lord for posting on Dodona and succumbing to that evil serpent, "Logic" amen Heathen, do not disgrace the Lord's Prayer.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 8:42:47 GMT -5
P.S. We ARE born gay more or less. The tendency becomes surpressed until puberty when sexual desires and sexual identity become more apparent to the individual. Homosexuals pushing a political agenda to justify their sickness. Homosexuals aren't born gay. traditionalvalues.org/urban/three.phpYou can be a homosexual, thats your choice, you have free will. Just keep it to yourself and don't poison the minds of the Americans with homosexual political activism, you guys are only 1.4 to 2.8% of the population, who cares about you anyway?
|
|
|
Post by stargazer on Dec 26, 2005 8:53:21 GMT -5
I'm not an intolerant person, its the homosexuals that are intolerant most of time because they will not tolerate people who disagree with their lifestyle. They immediately label people such as myself as a homophobe simply because I disagree with that lifestyle. Its my religious right to say that homosexuality is an abomination, as long as I don't advocate violence against homosexuality or mistreatement of homosexuals I'm not intolerant, but I'm never going to accept that kind of a lifestyle as normal. Its interesting how you refer to homosexuals as an almost militant caste dominating your society and denying you your rights. Its also interesting when probably less than 1 in 10 people are homosexual and certainly not all are out or even vocal that you claim to know what 'they' think, and how 'they' thoughtlessly label you. Can you please provide instances of when 'they' have labeled you? Nonsense, you cannot compare the plight of homosexuals to racism against blacks, homosexuals aren't born gay and they can certainly stop being gay if they want to. So you understand homosexual feeling and certainly have either personal experience to make this judgement? But I thought... So maybe, just maybe there is a possibility that your assumption of sexuality control is incorrect and that the situation is just the same as for someone who is black? If that lifestyle is not conducive to the will of god, yet he made people that way[some good evidence has been provided in the other links in this thread darling] are you saying he made people destined for Hell? Or are you saying God's work is faulty? links darling! Do you know why they tell those sort of things to kids? Because any kid could grow up to be a homosexual or know one and to use the kind of approach you seem to advocate would result in depression - maybe leading up to suicide(which is a sin) in some cases, or people perpetuating violence(another sin) against those they grew up with themselves. You may not endorse violence, but the situation you hope for would faccilitate it. If you are going to be this way, at least be consistent: I'm not an intolerant person Homosexuality is against nature and against God, even you Muslims see it as an abomination. You can hate the sin without hating the person. 'you Muslims'? Do you isolate every minority group you aren't a part of into some inferior concept? As for 'those Muslims', though the practice is rarer now - ceremonial boy marriages still occur. For example in late 2005, an Afghan refugee Liaquat Ali, 42, and his Pakistani beloved, Markeen Afridi, 16, celebrated a ceremonial wedding,[it was documented by the Sydney Morning Herald as well] and these practices were quite common in antiquity. Do you know how many ecological resources we are burning because our population is too large? Do you know how many orphans there are? Yet you are against the idea that a small minority of people will not be contributing to this excess? That just doesn't make sense. Fact: Not all gay men engage in sodomy. Fact: There are straight men and women who engage in sodomy. Fact: Being gay means someone loves another of the same sex romantically(alternatively you could be really happy). Every single other meaning you take from that word is from your own mind. And you're quite right, its none of your business to know that someone is homosexual. However its also none of our business to know you're religious, or that you are heterosexual or what your race is, or that you contradict yourself often. It hasn't stopped you from displaying those qualities though. And now, I will quote a delightful article I found - enjoy:
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Dec 26, 2005 9:10:55 GMT -5
Easy. I don't believe in God. God is the creation of man. Homosexuality is not natural and despite what you saay about animals and homosexuality, its rarely occurs in the amongst animals. Besides why would you partially justify your homosexuality on what animals do? I'm *NOT* your darling, I 100% straight, not even 1% crooked. If thats true why aren't most homosexuals Hindus and Buddhists? Homosexuals twist the scriptures to support their lifestyle, one homosexual tried use David and Jonathan of the Old Testament as proof that homosexuality was accepted, those are lies. I feel the same about homosexuality, its made up for the purpose of enjoyment, there's nothing natural about it.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Dec 26, 2005 9:19:25 GMT -5
So you understand homosexual feeling and certainly have either personal experience to make this judgement? But I thought... I never had a homosexual experience in my life and never will, its an abomination. Black is what I am because I was born black. I can change the fact that I'm black, but homosexuals can quit being gay if the get the right psychological treatment. Sexual perversion and race are two different things, homosexual sex is an act, being black is not an act. God is perfect, but man is not. God didn't create homosexuality, because if he did that would make HIM a CREATOR of sin. l I'm not your darling. See, you're already trying to push your homosexuality onto me.
|
|
|
Post by decadence on Dec 26, 2005 9:24:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Dec 26, 2005 9:32:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Dec 26, 2005 9:33:57 GMT -5
Freedom is. Including freedom to screw any consenting being. BTW Iran from a first wolrd point of view is below that minimum stage of developement to be blamed or praised, it can just be observed for scientific interest.
|
|
|
Post by stargazer on Dec 26, 2005 9:34:47 GMT -5
Homosexuality is not natural and despite what you saay about animals and homosexuality, its rarely occurs in the amongst animals. Besides why would you partially justify your homosexuality on what animals do? Animals are made by God, they are also 'natural' - they have these 'vices', and I hate to correct you but they are quite common. For example the Masked Lovebird of the genus Agapornis will form homosexual pairings - and quite dedicated ones, even going so far as to build nests together and in some cases mate for life. Darling, your sexuality is none of anyone's business. Where is the logic? This would only be anywhere near valid if people could choose their sexuality. And stop grouping people on what you 'know' they are 'all' doing. It makes your argument even weaker than it is. Yes. With you knowing so much about the pleasures of gay sex and all...
|
|
|
Post by metrosensual on Dec 26, 2005 9:46:41 GMT -5
Homosexuality is not natural and despite what you saay about animals and homosexuality, its rarely occurs in the amongst animals. Besides why would you partially justify your homosexuality on what animals do? Animals are made by God, they are also 'natural' - they have these 'vices', and I hate to correct you but they are quite common. For example the Masked Lovebird of the genus Agapornis will form homosexual pairings - and quite dedicated ones, even going so far as to build nests together and in some cases mate for life. Darling, your sexuality is none of anyone's business. Where is the logic? This would only be anywhere near valid if people could choose their sexuality. And stop grouping people on what you 'know' they are 'all' doing. It makes your argument even weaker than it is. Yes. With you knowing so much about the pleasures of gay sex and all... At least some people realise what I'm talking about. And LOL for the 'darling' and last line. Classic.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Dec 26, 2005 9:51:21 GMT -5
Homosexuality is not natural and despite what you saay about animals and homosexuality, its rarely occurs in the amongst animals. Besides why would you partially justify your homosexuality on what animals do? Animals are made by God, they are also 'natural' - they have these 'vices', and I hate to correct you but they are quite common. For example the Masked Lovebird of the genus Agapornis will form homosexual pairings - and quite dedicated ones, even going so far as to build nests together and in some cases mate for life. Homsexuality in animals is rare and is considered to be abnormal. Neither is your sexuality my business but you were all too quick in mentioning you are gay, you could have kept that to yourself. If homosexual sex is pleasure to you, thats your business why the hell would I even be interested in the pleasures of homosexual sex? I find this to be sick and disgusting on your part.
|
|
|
Post by stargazer on Dec 26, 2005 9:52:29 GMT -5
A. I was trying to push a patronising tone, not homosexuality B. What has a romantic/sexual interest in men got to do with the word 'darling'? Or were you looking for someone to push homosexuality on to you? Thats a really interesting proposition, it reminds me ever so slightly about a genetics article that I read a while back on homosexual inheritance being through the maternal line: www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6612 www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6519
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Dec 26, 2005 9:53:31 GMT -5
Animals are made by God, they are also 'natural' - they have these 'vices', and I hate to correct you but they are quite common. For example the Masked Lovebird of the genus Agapornis will form homosexual pairings - and quite dedicated ones, even going so far as to build nests together and in some cases mate for life. Darling, your sexuality is none of anyone's business. Where is the logic? This would only be anywhere near valid if people could choose their sexuality. And stop grouping people on what you 'know' they are 'all' doing. It makes your argument even weaker than it is. Yes. With you knowing so much about the pleasures of gay sex and all... At least some people realise what I'm talking about. And LOL for the 'darling' and last line. Classic. If you like homosexual sex and find it pleasureable please keep it to yourself, for most of us here, homosexual sex in disgusting and perverted.
|
|