|
Post by psychosemitic on Jan 3, 2006 1:50:01 GMT -5
Call me incredulous, but I don't believe it. Either that or you were seeing things. Tony, I do believe he would question her "whiteness". It's well-known that some Icelanders mixed with Eskimos. nice except for the fact that there arent/never where/wont be any Eskimos/Aleuts/Iniuts in iceland and there is no archeological evidence there ever where, u must be thinking of greenland, which btw is majority "eskimo"/mixed
|
|
|
Post by Yankel on Jan 3, 2006 2:17:20 GMT -5
Iceland is next to Greenland. As such, it's often speculated that there was gene flow the two populations.
Bjork's own label is called "One Little Indian" records, if I remember correctly. Ironically, Bjork looks a heck of a lot more Amerindian than you do.
|
|
|
Post by psychosemitic on Jan 3, 2006 2:37:46 GMT -5
Iceland is next to Greenland. As such, it's often speculated that there was gene flow the two populations. Bjork's own label is called "One Little Indian" records, if I remember correctly. Ironically, Bjork looks a heck of a lot more Amerindian than you do. speculations shmeculations, iceland has been sparesly populated since before the vikings populated it the only population there was gasp.......celts there has never been any proof,geneological,paleontological. or otherwise that that there has ever been a sedentary inuit establishment of any importance in the land we now call greenland, byork is just an aberrant specimen and in no way the epitome much less the zenith of the Icelandic people, her genotype if it in fact does have an asiatic component it is most likley second hand uralic.
|
|
|
Post by Yankel on Jan 3, 2006 2:51:15 GMT -5
You're right. It's speculated that there was gene flow between the two areas, but highly unlikely.
|
|
|
Post by psychosemitic on Jan 3, 2006 2:52:19 GMT -5
i like chocalate it is yummy
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Jan 3, 2006 3:11:27 GMT -5
Yigal does it piss you off knowing that Bjork has more Mongoloid ancestry than you. ;D
|
|
|
Post by psychosemitic on Jan 3, 2006 3:20:06 GMT -5
Yigal does it piss you off knowing that Bjork has more Mongoloid ancestry than you. ;D haha dude bjork has 0 Icelanders are the whitest country on earth
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Jan 3, 2006 3:21:56 GMT -5
Yeah you have to be on crack if you believe that Bjork is a pure unmixed Caucasoid.Most Dodoninites would laugh at that very thought.
|
|
|
Post by Funky Kong on Jan 3, 2006 3:42:11 GMT -5
Icelandics have both slight Mongoloid and Negroid ancestry.
It is likely that Björk is a descendant of some Lapp type imported by the Vikings, more so than Greenlandic.
|
|
|
Post by psychosemitic on Jan 3, 2006 5:07:19 GMT -5
Yeah you have to be on crack if you believe that Bjork is a pure unmixed Caucasoid.Most Dodoninites would laugh at that very thought. dude saying bjork is mixed race just because she looks odd and vaugley asian is saying Bababooey or Nick torturro are mullatoes because they are odd and vaugley rican and assuming she has some great great lapp grandmother, that isnt going to make her look like that, shes just odd, shes like 40 and looks 12 shes just not normal
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Jan 3, 2006 7:30:45 GMT -5
She definetly looks mixed. Even halfy (does that word exist?).
|
|
|
Post by Springa on Jan 3, 2006 8:46:15 GMT -5
It's well known bullshit, that's what it is. First, there were no eskimos in Iceland, and a few castaways wouldn't make any difference. Also, can you really picture people having children with eskimo castaways in ancient Iceland? Second, according to genetic studies, the Icelandic people are the single most purely European people in the world. Bjork looks like that because of chance. Look at her, no single trait of hers is impossible for a white person. I mean, you will see people with a nose like hers, with hair like hers, head shape, eyes, etc... which individually don't make a person look asian. But every once in a while a child will be born with this asian looking combination of all these traits, because of chance, because the combination of genes that for our appearance is random. So, once and for all: Inceland has nothing to do with Eskimos and Bjork is 100% european. Call me incredulous, but I don't believe it. Either that or you were seeing things. Tony, I do believe he would question her "whiteness". It's well-known that some Icelanders mixed with Eskimos.
|
|
|
Post by Springa on Jan 3, 2006 8:47:33 GMT -5
Yeah, and the Beatle's label was called Apple. Maybe that's why they all looked like apples. One Little Indian Records is called that because the guy who owns the label was in a punk band called Flux of Pink Indians. It's a British label and it has NOTHING to do with how she looks. Jesus... This is almost trolling in my opinion... Iceland is next to Greenland. As such, it's often speculated that there was gene flow the two populations. Bjork's own label is called "One Little Indian" records, if I remember correctly. Ironically, Bjork looks a heck of a lot more Amerindian than you do.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Jan 3, 2006 9:25:10 GMT -5
She looks euro here-like Katherine Zeta Jones type or even Welsh.
|
|
|
Post by Springa on Jan 3, 2006 9:30:52 GMT -5
Don't get me wrong, she does look exotic. My point is that weird looking people wll come up every once in a while without it having anything to do with race mixing. She looks euro here-like Katherine Zeta Jones type or even Welsh.
|
|