Amic
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by Amic on Feb 7, 2006 14:03:41 GMT -5
well go ahead
|
|
Amic
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by Amic on Feb 7, 2006 14:16:51 GMT -5
Dont be a coward tell us why you voted the way you did.
two people have voted and these are the people online
1 Staff Member, 6 Members, 15 Guests. Most users online was 62, Jan 24, 2006, 3:41pm
pavel2, Melnorme, Amic, mhagneto, BEGBIE, Gareth, sedated
so i wonder
|
|
Amic
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by Amic on Feb 7, 2006 14:18:19 GMT -5
there should be a way of blocking anonymous girly mons.
cowards.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Feb 7, 2006 14:47:02 GMT -5
Yes
No
Shady
To much theory
Sees things no one else does
Mixes andMatches other peoplesWork2FitHisView
That probably bests sums him up in my opinion.
I have no ill wishs nor judge him on any personal basis and aside from that I think he's OK.
However he does have very obvious qualities and traits of a modern day Neo-Nordicist (which are only a tad more liberal in their view..maybe),which one can't help but notice. The Nordic to him is the benchmark of the human races as far as he is concerned,credit on his part he admits that. So one really cant help but figure this influences his train of deductive reasoning at times and impairs his judgment.
His progressive theory which is half of his racial classification deduction reasoning, is inconsistent and nonsensical,and without scientific merit .However I' am confident that in National Socialist 1930's Germany,he would've been an outstanding student.
He's a very knowledgeable man,but I feel he misuses his knowledge when it comes to certain key issues and perhaps relies to much on Nordicist Anthropologists of the past and Pan-German folk Nationalism as a whole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arthur_Eld on Feb 7, 2006 14:52:03 GMT -5
Don't agree with the progressive stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by fm0210 on Feb 7, 2006 15:28:25 GMT -5
I voted 'yes', he is the very best poster here; in spite of I don't like his signature "Magna Europa est patria nostra".
|
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 7, 2006 15:33:16 GMT -5
Don't agree with the progressive stuff. From what I've seen, Agrippa is pretty much on target with Progression, although I think this is happening among non-Nords and non-Euros, as well. Everything from increasing cranial vault size to refinement of facial features indicates this is occurring fairly rapidly. Homo Sapiens Sapiens is a young and plastic species, so it shouldn't be surprising. Here is an interesting article on the biology of aestheitcs and art: www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=291 |
|
|
|
Post by Arthur_Eld on Feb 7, 2006 15:47:09 GMT -5
Don't agree with the progressive stuff. From what I've seen, Agrippa is pretty much on target with Progression, although I think this is happening among non-Nords as well. Everything from increasing cranial vault size to refinement of facial features indicates this is occurring fairly rapidly. Homo Sapiens Sapiens is a young and plastic species, so it shouldn't be surprising. Here is an interesting article on the biology of aestheitcs and art: www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=291you're missing the point, its about racial supremacy. |
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 7, 2006 15:49:18 GMT -5
you're missing the point, its about racial supremacy. I was always under the impression that it was about species supremacy. |
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Feb 7, 2006 15:54:08 GMT -5
No ..Its the Nordic that's the benchmark and top of his racial hierarchy chart and human evolution scale. Its pure Racial Supremacy theorem which the Nazi are famed for.
|
|
|
|
Post by mhagneto on Feb 7, 2006 16:18:23 GMT -5
I didnt vote. Have no opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Feb 7, 2006 19:31:02 GMT -5
No ..Its the Nordic that's the benchmark and top of his racial hierarchy chart and human evolution scale. Its pure Racial Supremacy theorem which the Nazi are famed for. I thought that he considered whatever groups that are tall with long noses to be supreme. I recall him saying that he himself is racially Mediterranean. |
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 7, 2006 22:18:22 GMT -5
I thought that he considered whatever groups that are tall with long noses to be supreme. We are  |
|
|
|
Post by Ilmatar on Feb 8, 2006 5:33:01 GMT -5
I answered "Sees things no one elese does". He really has an incredible visual perception. That makes him a master classifier, no matter if you agree or not with his theoretic framework.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Feb 8, 2006 9:47:26 GMT -5
I put no because despite how much anthropological evidence you post to refite his claims he will stick to the smae old outdated German books that no modern anthropologists even dares reference. He offers up theory upon theory as truths without any proof.
|
|
