|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 15:06:12 GMT -5
A white nationalist defending the NOI, a group that hates whites, is worse than an uncle Tom and more of a traitor.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 15:38:29 GMT -5
Galton, in your teen fantasy show Malcolm is an uncle tom. fine, OK...I read your explanations as to why you believe he was so, I found them to be childish to say the leas and though I dont believe your intentions was to troll, I too think this ridicilous thread should be closed and ended with. A word of advice, when contemplating history always start off with the BIG PICTURE in mind. Its apparent you spent considerable time reading about Malcolm X, so I dont need to ddelve the important role he played in African American self-determination, but just to make sure Malcolm X is an inspiration to many because he was unafraid to speak out and organize people who previously had no collective power for political action or for self-preservation against an openly racist, insecure, and aggressive society who used state power to instill fear in the black population and to subjugate its own citizens. Thats the big picture, so dont diminish the value of terms like ''uncle tom'' on someone like Malcolm X. Malcolm Little died about 40 years ago. His actions are recorded history in detail. This mythic image of him as a symbol of Black self-determinism is a phony. NOI is a real organization that still exists today that believes in real self-determinism through Black Nationalism. That means NO WHITEYS ALLOWED. Malcolm Little's feaux Black Activitism after his NOI defection was a placebo for the Black masses to consume some kind of need for a Black Identity symbol. Malcolm Little was the perfect diversion from the real Black Nationists, the NOI. Black people who followed Malcolm Little away from the NOI after his defection were afraid of real power and really probably afraid at the prospect of real success. The Black masses like being the abused step child of White Society. It's called the Stockholm Syndrome. Malcolm Little suffered from a slight case of Stockholm syndrome.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 15:48:28 GMT -5
A white nationalist defending the NOI, a group that hates whites, is worse than an uncle Tom and more of a traitor. Your inferences run wild and free like the wind. You have no control over it. Anyway, I didn't say I liked the NOI. I respect what they were trying to do. I still kind of respect them. Check this out. That's a NOI member taking charge of matters in his neighborhood. He's not in a white neighborhood. He's a black neighborhood telling these Arab liquor store owners to get out and stop poisoning his people. He's a member of the NOI, not some faux black ativitist group inspired by Malcolm Little with whities working at the lower levels. Malcolm Little defected from these guys.
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 16, 2006 15:51:22 GMT -5
A white nationalist defending the NOI, a group that hates whites, is worse than an uncle Tom and more of a traitor. Your inferences run wild and free like the wind. You have no control over it. Anyway, I didn't say I liked the NOI. I respect what they were trying to do. I still kind of respect them. Check this out. That's a NOI member taking charge of matters in his neighborhood. He's not in a white neighborhood. He's a black neighborhood telling these Arab liquor store owners to get out and stop poisoning his people. He's a member of the NOI, not some faux black ativitist group inspired by Malcolm Little with whities working at the lower levels. Malcolm Little defected from these guys. Nope I dont take you serious one bit.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 16:17:27 GMT -5
What's your point Wadad?
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Jan 16, 2006 17:05:28 GMT -5
A white nationalist defending the NOI, a group that hates whites, is worse than an uncle Tom and more of a traitor. Your inferences run wild and free like the wind. You have no control over it. Anyway, I didn't say I liked the NOI. I respect what they were trying to do. I still kind of respect them. Check this out. That's a NOI member taking charge of matters in his neighborhood. He's not in a white neighborhood. He's a black neighborhood telling these Arab liquor store owners to get out and stop poisoning his people. He's a member of the NOI, not some faux black ativitist group inspired by Malcolm Little with whities working at the lower levels. Malcolm Little defected from these guys. Dude! Those Arabs don't force anyone to buy alcohol. They supply a need. Nothing gives that jack ass the right to use violence because he doesn't like the fact that people like to booze up. A clear example of the authoritarian nature of the NOI. I wonder if that guy would have pulled the same stunt with black drug dealers or if the store had been owned by a black
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 23:37:12 GMT -5
Your inferences run wild and free like the wind. You have no control over it. Anyway, I didn't say I liked the NOI. I respect what they were trying to do. I still kind of respect them. Check this out. That's a NOI member taking charge of matters in his neighborhood. He's not in a white neighborhood. He's a black neighborhood telling these Arab liquor store owners to get out and stop poisoning his people. He's a member of the NOI, not some faux black ativitist group inspired by Malcolm Little with whities working at the lower levels. Malcolm Little defected from these guys. Dude! Those Arabs don't force anyone to buy alcohol. They supply a need. Nothing gives that jack ass the right to use violence because he doesn't like the fact that people like to booze up. A clear example of the authoritarian nature of the NOI. I wonder if that guy would have pulled the same stunt with black drug dealers or if the store had been owned by a black Booze isn't a necessity of life and it doesn't enhance a people nor does it enhance society. NOI are wise enough to understand this, but you don't.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Jan 16, 2006 23:53:40 GMT -5
Most things we do in our daily lives aren't a necessity of life. I find it strange that you would applaud violence against someone who only provides for a desire that MOST people in the community have. If people didn't want to drink he wouldn't be in business. Are you going to argue that attacking others who haven't committed a crime some how "enchances society"?
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 17, 2006 0:13:11 GMT -5
Most things we do in our daily lives aren't a necessity of life. I find it strange that you would applaud violence against someone who only provides for a desire that MOST people in the community have. If people didn't want to drink he wouldn't be in business. Are you going to argue that attacking others who haven't committed a crime some how "enchances society"? I do not advocate violence against others nor do I advocate breaking the law. However, I do not see any society being enhanced by the disproportionate amount of liquor stores in their community. I can respect how those NOI members felt, but I think they went about it the wrong way.
|
|