|
Post by ndrthl on Jan 21, 2006 13:02:49 GMT -5
Dinarics (pure and extreme ones) strike me as an ultra caucasoid looking group of people.
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 22, 2006 15:02:38 GMT -5
The graphic is not ideal. A lot of Negrids have steep foreheads for example, the degree of prognathy is exaggerated and many anthropologic traits not considered. The same is true of Claudia Schiffer, better find a middle way between saying either Europids or Negrids are flat-faced (put into relation with Mongoloids, they're not). She looks like an angular version of Aretha Franklin in this picture. Projecting Europid noses - Elena Dementieva is a good example and very beautiful too: Two variants of the Sudanid type (interbred between each other), with fully different prominence of the malars: Compare the facial relief of OJ Simpson with that of a Dane: a comment on Gareth's danish example - just from that example it would seem that nordoids are the most extreme looking caucasoids, although the whole gonial - mandibular area is more simplified, laterally compressed and forward facing normally. the extremeness comes about when the glabella area is strongly perforated with deeply notched glabellar formations, a very sharp abrupt nasion depression out of which springs a strong, relatively compressed triangularoid nose, the nasal tip might be elevated. comparatively the convex profile is definitely the weaker one. even protomorphical nordoids can be very extreme looking (like in some irish or british isles descended americans), the protomorphy relating to a strong mid face muzzling, with the prominent nasality, possibly more typically triangularoid straight than convex, although there are convex nosed nordids too. some american atlantids have some of the above peculiarities.
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 22, 2006 15:33:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 22, 2006 15:37:05 GMT -5
Muah ha. Yes:
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 22, 2006 15:40:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 23, 2006 1:38:57 GMT -5
a comment on Gareth's danish example - just from that example it would seem that nordoids are the most extreme looking caucasoids, although the whole gonial - mandibular area is more simplified, laterally compressed and forward facing normally. the extremeness comes about when the glabella area is strongly perforated with deeply notched glabellar formations, a very sharp abrupt nasion depression out of which springs a strong, relatively compressed triangularoid nose, the nasal tip might be elevated. comparatively the convex profile is definitely the weaker one. even protomorphical nordoids can be very extreme looking (like in some irish or british isles descended americans), the protomorphy relating to a strong mid face muzzling, with the prominent nasality, possibly more typically triangularoid straight than convex, although there are convex nosed nordids too. some american atlantids have some of the above peculiarities. Do you even know what you are talking about?
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 23, 2006 12:59:58 GMT -5
a comment on Gareth's danish example - just from that example it would seem that nordoids are the most extreme looking caucasoids, although the whole gonial - mandibular area is more simplified, laterally compressed and forward facing normally. the extremeness comes about when the glabella area is strongly perforated with deeply notched glabellar formations, a very sharp abrupt nasion depression out of which springs a strong, relatively compressed triangularoid nose, the nasal tip might be elevated. comparatively the convex profile is definitely the weaker one. even protomorphical nordoids can be very extreme looking (like in some irish or british isles descended americans), the protomorphy relating to a strong mid face muzzling, with the prominent nasality, possibly more typically triangularoid straight than convex, although there are convex nosed nordids too. some american atlantids have some of the above peculiarities. Do you even know what you are talking about? red signs indicate the glabella area - www.uni-mainz.de/FB/Medizin/Anatomie/makro1/f006v.gif
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 23, 2006 14:54:42 GMT -5
glabella folding from frowning as expressed in this woman, the photos denote a cosmetic procedure to de - emphasize the prominence - i personally don't see this trait as disharmoic or unappealing since it has a kind of rugged appeal - www.seattledoctors.com/images/frown.jpg
|
|
|
Post by ndrthl on Jan 23, 2006 17:41:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 24, 2006 16:30:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by labi on Jan 25, 2006 15:18:34 GMT -5
^the albo guy in coons plate is noric. his CI is 87. now as someone said pure-extreme dinarids are the extreme caucasians. look at zlatan for example........
|
|
|
Post by ndrthl on Jan 25, 2006 15:43:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by labi on Jan 25, 2006 16:02:19 GMT -5
^exactly. very sharp facial features. long-faced. tall and muscular, long nose but not ridicously large like a spear. and brachylized, a new feature to humans.
if a super big nose makes someone the uber caucasoid than thats like saying the most de-pegemented are the uber-caucasoids. both features were selected in caucasoids but their selection stabalized not over-selected. caucasoid is not going in the direction of being white like a snow-man or the nose like a pelican beak. this extreme features developed/adopted to caucasoids who live in extreme enviroments.
|
|
|
Post by ndrthl on Jan 25, 2006 16:26:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by labi on Jan 25, 2006 16:45:19 GMT -5
alpines and other small UPs are domesticated caucasoids. less aggressive more coopertive softer features. they dont represent the dorection of the caucasoid evolution(at least not original direction). they represent civilization, dense population, domestication.
i think european countries are making the right decision to lower populations. this will slow alpanisation process.
|
|