|
Post by penetratorx on Oct 14, 2005 7:26:26 GMT -5
What d'yall think about the children that are reported to be michael jacksons, I just seen a pic of him in a newspaper with 2 of them and 1 of them has light brown/dark blonde hair and the other is extremely blonde, you cant see their faces too well as they were covered by nets but from what I could tell they look very North European. So whats your opinion - do you think it possible or likely that someone who started out in life as a fairly typicle african american could father at least 2 children who are blonde and seem to not show any signs of being negroid. I think he has 3 children and wonder what the other 1 looks like if there is indeed 3. The mother of the children is his ex nurse or something I believe and she is North European and I know there is a chance an african american could father a child with a European mother that would appear to be European as virtually all african americans have European dna in their make up but the chances of it happening are very low and of it happening 2 or even 3 times in a row must be about a billion - 1 2 blonde children from this - you must be joking !
|
|
Melani2333
Full Member
http://www.livingwaters.com
Posts: 194
|
Post by Melani2333 on Oct 14, 2005 8:59:32 GMT -5
Please! Everyone kows those are not his kids, but Debbie's and a sperm donors. Some source even came out about that "rumor" at his trial. Those are not his biological children. Micheal has several biracial nephews/nieces and his biological kids would all look like them. Only mullatos can produce white quadroons and Micheal, although a medium Black American, is no mullato.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Oct 14, 2005 9:05:44 GMT -5
Those are his cihldren. They have african features when you see them up close but the light skin colour throws people off.
He uses bleach on his son's hair as well. The boy has jet-black roots.
The biracial newphew he has are from the singing group 3-T and they look very Caucasoid. Their mother is 1/2 Black and 1/2 Hispanic.
MJ uses the same things on his children as on himself. he straightens their hair and changes the colouring.
he sheilds them with veils not to conceal their identitity, but their ethnicity from being obvious.
There is a snap of his first child, Prince Michael I on the cover of UK mag. he is obviously bi-racial.
|
|
Melani2333
Full Member
http://www.livingwaters.com
Posts: 194
|
Post by Melani2333 on Oct 14, 2005 9:22:55 GMT -5
Those are his cihldren. They have african features when you see them up close but the light skin colour throws people off. He uses bleach on his son's hair as well. The boy has jet-black roots. The biracial newphew he has are from the singing group 3-T and they look very Caucasoid. Their mother is 1/2 Black and 1/2 Hispanic. MJ uses the same things on his children as on himself. he straightens their hair and changes the colouring. he sheilds them with veils not to conceal their identitity, but their ethnicity from being obvious. There is a snap of his first child, Prince Michael I on the cover of UK mag. he is obviously bi-racial. Okay, prove it and post those pics. Those are white children.....
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Oct 14, 2005 10:23:41 GMT -5
Penetratorx, Debby Rowe--the biological mother of two of the children--has already admitted that Jackson was not the biological father. She has never publicized this fact, though, because of a clause in her legal agreement with Jackson. He's apparently desperate for the public to think he's white--hence the purchasing of white children to pass them off as his own. It sorts very well with his obsession to bleach his skin and thin his features. He's clearly got body dismorphic dysfunction. The purcashing of white children, though, goes a bit far. How is that even legal? P.S.--To the silly person who's laboring under the misapprehension that Jackson's dna would yield German or Norwegian kids . . . I can only ask you to google Jackson and read about the legal clause forbidding Miss Rowe to publicly talk about his paternity. If he was biologically the father of these Nordic children, why would he have a clause that threatens to take away her money if she discusses the subject of his paternity? Come on! I'm a father of two white kids myself. Nowhere did I threaten and blackmail my wife to NOT discuss the subject of their paternity. Why? --Because they're clearly mine. So why, then--you have to ask yourself--is Jackson extorting her complicity in advancing his version of events? P.P.S.--As to Jackson's own ancestry, take a look at this revealing analysis by top genetics experts from around the world:
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Oct 14, 2005 10:44:27 GMT -5
He shouldn't even have custody of those kids. I take it most people here saw how he hung his child out the window while waving to his fans. The man is ill and those kids should be taken from him.
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Oct 14, 2005 10:58:43 GMT -5
Anunnaki, Jackson's dangling a baby out a window shows just how much he considers the kids he "bought" props.
P.S.--Despite Debbie Rowe's divorce agreement (in which she promised not to publicly discuss Jackson's alleged paternity), she recently vied for full custody of the children. In the legal briefs, she admitted that Jackson was not the biological father. Here's the initial ABC News article:
" abc.com - news
Report: Jackson's Kids' Paternity Questioned
LOS ANGELES — There is a new report that says Michael Jackson is not the biological father of his two older children. This comes from the children's mother Debbie Rowe who apparently now wants temporary exclusive custody. Jacko is not their father according to the British newspaper the News of the World.
It quotes legal papers by Debbie Rowe that claim she became pregnant through artificial insemination from an anonymous donor. Rowe says she and Jackson entered into a surrogacy agreement in 1996. According to the paper their marriage ceremony was only for securing his parental rights.
Now a source close to the Jackson family claims that child welfare officials came to Jackson's Beverly Hills Mansion on Friday. The source tells ABC News that Jackson's three children were interviewed, as well as their nannies and nurses. Jackson was apparently home at the time.
California child welfare officials wouldn't comment saying al investigations are confidential. Some attorneys say this could be the first step to see if the children should stay with Jackson.
Jackson's critics have long suggested he may be an unfit father. After seeing this British documentary last February, child welfare advocate Gloria Gruber sent a formal complaint herself to the Santa Barbara DA saying "Jackson has raised enough red flags to be concerned about protecting the welfare of children with whom he comes in contact, including his own."
According to the British Tabloid Debbie Rowe says Jackson has shown "poor judgment by saying it is acceptable for him to sleep in the same bed with children.""
In previous interviews Jackson has vowed to fight to keep his children.
|
|
|
Post by penetratorx on Oct 14, 2005 10:59:18 GMT -5
If they used a sperm donor then it most likely would of been someone with blonde hair, maybe he had a little left over from when he used to spend time with Macaulay Culkin - perhaps he didnt swallow everytime, but then was Macaulay Culkin old enough to be producing it back then !
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Oct 16, 2005 4:05:23 GMT -5
I think it's pretty clear that those are not his children. Lets say he was the biological father of the first child that came out white the likelyhood that this would repeat itself is like me winning the lottery twice in a row.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Oct 19, 2005 7:22:20 GMT -5
Those are his cihldren. They have african features when you see them up close but the light skin colour throws people off. He uses bleach on his son's hair as well. The boy has jet-black roots. The biracial newphew he has are from the singing group 3-T and they look very Caucasoid. Their mother is 1/2 Black and 1/2 Hispanic. MJ uses the same things on his children as on himself. he straightens their hair and changes the colouring. he sheilds them with veils not to conceal their identitity, but their ethnicity from being obvious. There is a snap of his first child, Prince Michael I on the cover of UK mag. he is obviously bi-racial. Okay, prove it and post those pics. Those are white children..... If you watch a clip of the documentary with Martin Bashir and look closely-not being consumed by "hair" and "colour" you can see his daughter's facial features resemble many light mulatto/quadroom like Soledad O'Brien. During one scene, the eldest boy had some harlequin mask on and when the camera did close-up of him, he had 1" black hair roots and an obvious very white bleached hair job. His eyes are extremely dark and have a "negroid" appearance. It was obvious the child was wearing a stage pancake makeup b/c of the chalkiness and lack of appearance of blood flow under skin in naturally coloured children's faces. The snap in the UK magazine was of MJ and Debbie Rowe together holding the 1st baby. He was a very light mulatto with dark hair and a light colour tan on his skin. The daughter has full lips and large eyes that resemble that of MJ's eldest sister. her hair has had a chemical processing and lightening in it. Under the veils, she also has on thick, chalky white make-up-the same type Halle Berry used to play a White woman in the movie, Queen. The youngest child has obviously mulatto traits. He is the darkest now(was lighter when an infant) and his hair is curly. I'm not trying to prove anything but I know how people are quick to judge simply b/c of his surgeries and b/c they do not like him but think about it. He has chemically/surgically altered himself. He will do the same with his own children with tricks like make-up, bleaching and chemical straightening of hair, and minor surgeries. This is a very common thing. Many mothers in Bengal, Seychelle, and SE Asia do this to their kids-minus the hair bleaching. They have cosmetics for children in South area of Philippines with "mild lightening agent" made from berries in a compact case that is a mixture of bleach/foundation powder/zinc sunscreen.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Oct 24, 2005 9:43:31 GMT -5
You can see clearly that the boy's hair is chemically processed and bleached. His skin colour is even more obvious. The girl's hair, also mildly processed is obviously that of a mulatto texture. Look at the strange hands on the children. These light-coloured mulattoid children are wearing flesh-toned gloves to prevent any tanning and to give the children's hands a whiter appearance. If you zoom in on the pic, you can clearly see the mixed features of the child on the right-well even if you dont' zoom, it's obvious. If he hasn't already, I believe he will give the children rhinoplasties.
|
|
|
Post by jam on Oct 24, 2005 14:55:09 GMT -5
If that's really true (who knows) then he surely is unfit. It sounds pretty insane to me, but it's the king of pop we're talking about I sure hope it's untrue.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Oct 24, 2005 18:32:36 GMT -5
If that's really true (who knows) then he surely is unfit. It sounds pretty insane to me, but it's the king of pop we're talking about I sure hope it's untrue. Anyone who would put any child thru this needs severe therapy. Why are people afraid to tell him NO? Why do the idiots around him do this crap to those kids. Someone has to be helping him do this. That is WRONG. I hope he is not using that bleach crap on those poor children. I doubt they even get sun exposure like normal children. Geez.
|
|
|
Post by zemelmete on Oct 26, 2005 1:10:59 GMT -5
Interesting, who is mother of those children? She must be one crazy woman!
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Oct 26, 2005 11:12:48 GMT -5
He's truly sick if he bleaches the boy's hair. What on Earth for??
|
|