|
Post by AWAR on Jan 6, 2004 19:17:26 GMT -5
I have those plates on my computer. You got Asiatic Dinaric, I'll try to post the plate.
|
|
|
Post by sublime on Jan 7, 2004 18:29:57 GMT -5
Ripped some cool info from skadi ;D Classification of measurements -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Head form Lenghts: x-169mm : very short 170-177mm : short 178-185mm : moderately long 186-193mm : long 194-x mm : very long Breadths: x-139mm : very narrow 140-147mm : narrow 148-155mm : moderately broad 156-163mm : broad 164-x mm : very broad B. Nose form Heights: x-49mm : very low 50-52mm : low 53-55mm : moderate 56-58mm : high 59-x mm : very high Breadths: x- 30mm : very narrow 31-33mm : narrow 34-36mm : medium 37-39mm : broad 40-x mm : very broad C. Facial morphology: Heights: x- 111mm : very low 112-117mm : low 118-123mm : medium 124-129mm : high 130-x mm : very high Widths: x-127mm : very narrow 128-135mm : narrow 136-143mm : medium 144-151mm : broad 152-x mm : very broad Source: Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt, Die Forschung am Menschen.Teil1: Geschichte und Methoden der Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1940. Sublime, next time you rip-off someone else's information, be sure to post the link from where you've taken it, or at least sign the original poster.
In this case the author of the original post at www.skadi.net/forum is FRANS JOZEF aka GRENSLANDER . post edited by AWAR
|
|
|
Post by Razmig on Jan 7, 2004 19:21:08 GMT -5
how are you guys getting these measurements, it surely cannot be done with a ruler, i was mesocephalic, but i drew a line on a wall, took a ruler and had someone mark it so i measure it horizontally.
there is an instrument used to measure breadths/lenghts, what is it called?
|
|
|
Post by sublime on Jan 7, 2004 19:32:33 GMT -5
a caliper? see my post above (reply #47 on this thread) which links to my results
|
|
|
Post by Satyros on Jan 15, 2004 18:34:42 GMT -5
Measurement of the required measurements can only done correctly with the help of a second person.
My results by doing the measurements myself:
Your cephalic index is: 67.5 (hyperdolichocephalic) Your height/length index is: 55 (platycephalic) Your height/breadth index is: 81.5 (metriocephalic) Your facial index is: 113.6 (hyperleptoprosopic) Your upper facial index is: 72.7 (leptene) Your nasal index is: 80 (mesorrhine) Your estimated endocranial volume is: 1188 cc (oligocephalic) Your estimated brain weight is: 1070 gr
Your classification is Mediterranoid (using Euclidean distance), Mediterranoid (using Mahalanobis distance), and Irano-Nordoid (using Cosine similarity).
Euclidean Distance Proto-Europoid: 89 Mediterranoid: 40 Alpinoid: 71 Irano-Nordoid: 44 Dinaroid: 66
Cosine Similarity Proto-Europoid: -0.53 Mediterranoid: 0.61 Alpinoid: -0.64 Irano-Nordoid: 0.63 Dinaroid: -0.28
I dont think these measurements are 100% accurate though for anyone who posted in this thread as they have to be taken by a professional.
|
|
Marina
Full Member
Just call me French-Hammerette!
Posts: 245
|
Post by Marina on Jan 17, 2004 23:45:45 GMT -5
Fascinating! But I hope there will be one for Caucasian females soon.
|
|
|
Post by geirr on Jan 24, 2004 21:45:15 GMT -5
My results-
Results of Racial Analysis
Your cephalic index is: 82.1 (brachycephalic) Your height/length index is: 68.4 (hypsicephalic) Your height/breadth index is: 83.3 (metriocephalic) Your facial index is: 99.3 (hyperleptoprosopic) Your upper facial index is: 59.9 (leptene) Your nasal index is: 61.6 (leptorrhine) Your estimated endocranial volume is: 1447 cc (euencephalic) Your estimated brain weight is: 1346 gr Euclidean Distance Mahalanobis Distance Cosine Similarity
Proto-Europoid: 12 22 0.31 Mediterranoid: 19 46 -0.4 Alpinoid: 13 19 -0.44 Irano-Nordoid: 9 12 0.19 Dinaroid: 6 3 0.51
Your classification is Dinaroid (using Euclidean distance), Dinaroid (using Mahalanobis distance), and Dinaroid (using Cosine similarity).
According to Euclidean Distance: You are metrically closest to Plate 15, Figure 1 (distance = 5) You are metrically furthest from Plate 10, Figure 5 (distance = 56) According to Mahalanobis Distance: You are metrically closest to Plate 13, Figure 1 (distance = 3) You are metrically furthest from Plate 10, Figure 5 (distance = 137) According to Cosine Similarity: You are metrically closest to Plate 35, Figure 1 (similarity = 0.66) You are metrically furthest from Plate 45, Figure 2 (similarity = -0.842)
|
|
jul
Junior Member
Posts: 80
|
Post by jul on Feb 6, 2004 9:58:18 GMT -5
YEAH Marina, i would like to see a Womans Calculator too..Sniff sniff... Puppy eyes to Dienekes...Pleaase.
|
|
toska
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by toska on Mar 5, 2004 3:54:28 GMT -5
What am I? Please explain what these figures tell me about my racial ancestry.
Results of Racial Analysis
Your cephalic index is: 68.2 (hyperdolichocephalic) Your height/length index is: 62.7 (hypsicephalic) Your height/breadth index is: 92 (acrocephalic) Your facial index is: 135 (hyperleptoprosopic) Your upper facial index is: 60.7 (leptene) Your nasal index is: 56.4 (leptorrhine) Your estimated endocranial volume is: 1334 cc (euencephalic) Your estimated brain weight is: 1226 gr
Euclidean Distance Mahalanobis Distance Cosine Similarity Proto-Europoid: 98 97 0.37 Mediterranoid: 140 231 -0.43 Alpinoid: 128 169 -0.47 Irano-Nordoid: 105 136 0.29 Dinaroid: 101 107 0.38
Your classification is Proto-Europoid (using Euclidean distance), Proto-Europoid (using Mahalanobis distance), and Dinaroid (using Cosine similarity).
|
|
Praetor
Full Member
Graecus in Fennia
Posts: 246
|
Post by Praetor on Mar 5, 2004 12:23:57 GMT -5
Judging by your subracial distances you got your measurements pretty badly.
|
|
toska
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by toska on Mar 5, 2004 20:42:11 GMT -5
What is the best method of obtaining accuarate measurements? I tried to do it again with similar results.
|
|
|
Post by Tecumseh on Mar 7, 2004 1:03:41 GMT -5
I'm mixed, it won't work for me
|
|
|
Post by labi on Mar 7, 2004 15:37:18 GMT -5
im ofcourse a med. ;D
my results..............
Your cephalic index is: 78.9 (mesocephalic) Your height/length index is: 69.7 (hypsicephalic) Your height/breadth index is: 88.3 (acrocephalic) Your facial index is: 85.7 (mesoprosopic) Your upper facial index is: 50 (euryene) Your nasal index is: 64 (leptorrhine) Your estimated endocranial volume is: 1425 cc (euencephalic) Your estimated brain weight is: 1323 gr
Euclidean Distance Mahalanobis Distance Cosine Similarity Proto-Europoid: 37 116 -0.83 Mediterranoid: 4 2 0.81 Alpinoid: 12 33 0.09 Irano-Nordoid: 10 24 0.31 Dinaroid: 20 54 -0.61
Your classification is Mediterranoid (using Euclidean distance), Mediterranoid (using Mahalanobis distance), and Mediterranoid (using Cosine similarity).
According to Euclidean Distance:
You are metrically closest to Plate 9, Figure 5 (distance = 4) You are metrically furthest from Plate 5, Figure 1 (distance = 84)
According to Mahalanobis Distance: You are metrically closest to Plate 28, Figure 2 (distance = 3) You are metrically furthest from Plate 5, Figure 1 (distance = 237)
According to Cosine Similarity: You are metrically closest to Plate 9, Figure 5 (similarity = 0.81) You are metrically furthest from Plate 39, Figure 6 (similarity = -0.912)
========= ive done this many times. i suggest for people to have their head breadth and bizygomatic by someone else. thats the hardest part to measure. the rest you can do yourself. now that i did as im suggesting to others my mathces came closer than ever meaning everything is within normal range. i dont know what the slides look like since that site is no longer in service but im sure icant get my meausrements better than this.
if those numbers say anything about my med type please let me know.
|
|
|
Post by danielou on Apr 6, 2004 17:25:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Apr 6, 2004 17:40:51 GMT -5
proto-Europoid what does it means ? It's very roughly equivalent to 'Upper Paleolithic' or 'East Baltic', I think.
|
|