|
Post by Aria88 on Aug 13, 2004 22:39:06 GMT -5
WWII was just another excuse to kill millions of good White men. Both sides were right. Both were wrong. The Germans had strength, dignity and spectacular ideologies and methods in order to attain their goals. Unfortunately, one of their defects was the millennia-old obsession with drang nach osten and lebensraum, which poses a dilemma when one realizes this would displace many other good White people, who happen to be no better or worse genetically that the Germans. The NSDAP existed only for the benefit of Germany, which is why I believe in Nationalism, but never at the expense of other Whites.
IranianLion, my reference was to the savage Arab culture of Islamic paradise. I am not anti-Arab, but, as I've stated before on various threads, the best, most elegant and enlightened aspects of Islam are the result of Iranian influence. Islam without these attributes is simply another dirty desert religion. Nothing like the beautiful Mazdean religion.
|
|
|
Post by SwordandCompass on Aug 14, 2004 7:25:57 GMT -5
Question,someone claiming to be a "racial preservationist" and not married and no kids wouldnt that make you a hypocrite?
|
|
|
Post by Anima Eternae on Aug 14, 2004 15:11:55 GMT -5
Nice job Norcal, mopping up the PC lemming. In any case, the problem is not immigration per se but the failure to integrate immigrants. That's the immigrant's fault. Their culture is far too different. It only took a generation or two for white immigrants to assimilate. You're right, if anything, the immigration will get worse, speeding up the demographic collapse. Do some research behind the 1920's and 1960's immigration reform debates. There's no shortage of Jew-inspired non-white immigration. I recommend reading the last chapters of Culture of Critique. Hey dummy, people will breed and marry those who closest share their phenotypes. Are you denying basic biology now? Strawman. A spaniard is just as white as a dutchman. They both have beautiful women, unlike the negroes and hispanics. Of course halfricans aren't treated like royalty, the other negroes are jealous of them. That is utter rubbish. Lighter skin and other western features are clearly and universally associated with beauty, especially in the Indian subcontinent. I have no idea what planet you're living on. Race mixing as always been limited, but so has immigration into sovereign states. Everything has changed. Race mixing is just a symptom of massive immigration which is a symptom of the Jews. They come here for money. Nothing else. And they certainly have no desire to assimilate. Open your eyes. Jews pulled anti-semetism out of their ass because they hate being named. The correct term is anti-Jew. Ever notice how many yids accuse arabs of being "anti-semetic"?
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Aug 14, 2004 15:34:01 GMT -5
The immigration reformers of the 1960's, Jews, Irish and whoever else, obviously did not anticipate that America would be flooded with Mexicans 30 years later.
It's very easy to arrive at conclusions that you like when you look only at the facts that support those conclusions. But scientific it ain't.
|
|
|
Post by IranianLion on Aug 14, 2004 16:13:00 GMT -5
IranianLion, my reference was to the savage Arab culture of Islamic paradise. I am not anti-Arab, but, as I've stated before on various threads, the best, most elegant and enlightened aspects of Islam are the result of Iranian influence. Islam without these attributes is simply another dirty desert religion. Nothing like the beautiful Mazdean religion. Yes, I understand that Judaism is a variant of Zoroastrianism and Islam is a variant of Judaism. But I'm not too religious (that's an understatement) and the thought of leaving the dead to be eaten by vultures isn't particularly appealing. That said I can find hardly anything appealing about Islam. I don't particularly like Arabs. I know many of them would like to kill us and most of the others won't bat an eyelid if they gave it a go. But I don't need to engage in the silly ideology peddled by SUMKA. Besides, Arab Iranians fought with us to defend Iran. What's wrong with the old Jephe Melli? The Arabs have produced many learned men (even though they have tried to claim many "Persian" learned men as their own) so their culture cannot simply be dismissed as "dirty". Men like Ibn Rushd, Ibn Haiyan, Ibn Zuhr and Ibn Khaldun should not be dismissed lightly.
|
|
|
Post by IranianLion on Aug 14, 2004 17:24:56 GMT -5
Nice job Norcal, mopping up the PC lemming. Let's just ignore the fact that his explanation for Germany's defeat in WWII is woefully inadequate shall we? And diregard his Kempite agenda which labels Southern Europeans as "miscegenated muds". You agree with that too Anima? No, it's largely not their fault. The immigrants were invited by politicians and the responsibility for integrating them lies squarely on those same politicians' shoulders. The politicians should make it clear that immigrants should strive to adopt the culture of their adopted state and set policy to aid this. The USA is much better at integrating immigrants than European countries. Besides, the culture of the Jews who emigrated to the USA was very different to that of the USA yet they managed to integrate didn't they? Oh, can you prove that "their" culture is too different to integrate? How would you describe the culture of the USA and Western European countries? Possibly. But Europeans are not stupid and they've managed to get out of many a pickle. I think it more likely that they will adapt to avoid the impending disaster. Again. The problem is not immigration per se but the failure to integrate immigrants. The blame for that cannot be attributed to the Jews and the Jews alone can it? Besides, has immigration not increased anti-Semitic feeling in Europe. You would think that the Jews would be campaigning against immigration in Europe wouldn't you? Rubbish. A person will try to breed with somebody whose phenotype they find attractive (of course, many people will not base their choice on phenotype). As with all matters of aesthetic appeal, there are no hard and fast rules. And you are being contradictory. You say that "non-whites" are dying to breed with "whites" one minute and then the next you are saying that goes against basic biology. If it's basic biology there would be no race mixing (and it would never become a "problem"). Keep trying. I'll disregard the insult this time. You're getting desperate, ain't ya? Let me repeat. Based on your logic one would expect "non-whites" to lust after the palest, pastiest Caucasoids (Nicole Kidman for instance) rather than darker Caucasoids (Salma Hayek for example). This is not verifiable and goes against my personal experience. You may not find "black" and "Hispanic" (I hate this term but when you're in Rome...) women attractive but many "white" people do not share your opinion. You need to resist the sollipsistic tendency to regard your opinion as a universal truth. Based on your logic, "halfricans" should be lusted after not treated badly due to jealousy. Until recently I gather they were treated like freaks until "white" culture latched onto them as a kind of "royalty". Who sets the standards of beauty in the USA and Europe? Who owns the fashion magazines? You have not proven that lighter skin is universally associated with beauty. Indeed, don't some "blacks" grow Afros to differentiate themselves? Besides, South Asians are overwhelmingly Caucasoid and these "Western" features are indigenous to the subcontinent. If South Asians do find lighter skin et al. more attractive (and I'm not saying they universally do), it's not like they prefer "whites" to their own. There is a significant South Asian community in my country and my personal experience suggests that South Asians largely date each other not "whites". Some popular Bollywood actors are not even that light skinned such as Naseeruddin Shah (I think that's how it's spelled but he spells it wrong in any case) and Shah Rukh Khan. This just underlines that there is no universal standard of beauty. You have not proven this. Race mixing is still quite limited even after significant immigration. I have no reason to believe and you have provided no evidence that it will become more prevalent. Again, you have not proven this. Even if they have come for money they should be made to integrate. If they are not integrating that is the fault of politicians. And is it not the case that the more integrated have better earning potential? I think you're being a tad pedantic here. It's pretty obvious that anti-Semitism is prejudice against Jews. It's not exactly hiding is it? We all know what it means. "Anti-Jew" (sp.?) is simply a subset of anti-Semitism. What's the problem? I care not how some Jews exploit the term "anti-Semitic". But even a Jew can be "anti-Semitic" so I do not see how an Arab could not be. Bobby Fischer is a clear example of an anti-Semitic Jew (read his Time Magazine interview).
|
|
|
Post by Anima Eternae on Aug 14, 2004 21:34:13 GMT -5
The immigration reformers of the 1960's, Jews, Irish and whoever else, obviously did not anticipate that America would be flooded with Mexicans 30 years later. It's very easy to arrive at conclusions that you like when you look only at the facts that support those conclusions. But scientific it ain't. You have presented no facts. You are GUESSING that they did not intend for their "reforms" to change the demographics of America, which is bull.
|
|
|
Post by Anima Eternae on Aug 14, 2004 21:44:14 GMT -5
Let's just ignore the fact that his explanation for Germany's defeat in WWII is woefully inadequate shall we? And diregard his Kempite agenda which labels Southern Europeans as "miscegenated muds". You agree with that too Anima? Let's just ignore the fact compared to what she has put forth... Hahahaha. Politcians are responsible for the way immigrants behave? Do you dirty liberals have no end of avoiding responsibility? Intregation is a side detail, the main focus is demographic destruction. Islamic scum don't assimilate, they come to dominate, europe especially. Not with the media which is not even owned by them, working against themselves. Immigrants are responsible for not integrating themselves. Use your brain. And you're correct, there is a more recent divide among Jews about immigration, because many new immigrants tend to be "anti-semitic". That's not contradictory, whelp. People generally prefer their own company, if when you compare their desire for women of other races, white tops the list. I've already adressed this stupid strawman. You're telling me if you ask a random white guy if he prefers white women or negresses, it will be split 50/50? You're full of it. Pick up a national geographic. I'm not going to wipe your ass for you. Lighter skin is associated with greater beauty in most cultures. Yes, I have. You refuse to accept it. Jesus, you're pathetic. If come to another country to make money and I want to keep my "culture" at the expense of the host country, how the hell is that poltician's fault? Maybe because they're the ones who allowed the muds into the country in the first place. Bobby Fischer is a good man. He has his head screwed on right. Naming the Jew is step one. They hate that.
|
|
|
Post by Aria88 on Aug 14, 2004 23:47:35 GMT -5
IranianLion (ShiroKhorshid), Only English, please, according to proboards rules Gee, all I said in Farsi was that I like Jebhe Melli (National Front), too.
|
|
|
Post by gbloco on Aug 15, 2004 1:53:13 GMT -5
Hitler -- alpha male
The reason most WN glorifiy the fuhrer is precisely because he wasn't an alpha male. It offers them hope. A nerd, an outcast who became adored by millions.
But he still couldn't get it up.
|
|
|
Post by BallisticaNervosa on Aug 15, 2004 4:50:37 GMT -5
It's all for status symbols, and it's all very superficial. Like everything else in the whole universe…<br> Anyway, as some of you said, I find black and amerindian women ugly (Repulsive is a rather strong word, and a couple of you guys actually had the balls to say it.) I like blonds, but I prefer Med or Dinaric brunettes. I, being Med, is logical I think. As some of you have already said, we are programmed to mate with those who seem to be closer to us.
|
|
|
Post by BallisticaNervosa on Aug 15, 2004 5:06:55 GMT -5
"Dictatorship? LOL Hitler was merely the Alpha Male who proved his ability, and doesn't it bite your ass that 98% of the German people LOVED him? Some "dictatorship." . Hmmm, what is the "Alpha Male"? It sounds interesting. I'm not a WN (I consider myself a harmless racial preservationist) but this sounds like good reading material.
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Aug 15, 2004 5:23:16 GMT -5
Hmmm, what is the "Alpha Male"? It sounds interesting. I'm not a WN (I consider myself a harmless racial preservationist) but this sounds like good reading material. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_male
|
|
|
Post by BallisticaNervosa on Aug 15, 2004 5:28:37 GMT -5
Thank you Melnorme
|
|
|
Post by IranianLion on Aug 15, 2004 6:51:43 GMT -5
Let's just ignore the fact compared to what she has put forth... You congratulated norcal. You endorsed his Kempite position which labels Southern Europeans as "miscegenated muds". Not totally responsible but they should a large part of the responsibility. Informal segregation and lack of incentive to integrate ("they don't like us, why should we integrate?") are the chief obstacles. Prove it. Don't assume the merely making a statement makes it true. Back to your sollipsism again... The media prevents Europeans from breeding? Rubbish. The media is often highlighting low birth rates in Europe. How do you think it became such an issue? See above. I thought the evil Jewish cabal never made mistakes? It is contradictory. You said it was a universal fact of basic biology. If it was there would be no race mixing. You've changed your tune haven't you? About as effectively as your other ripostes i.e. abysmally. Strawman. That's not what I said. But in my experience many "whites" find "blacks" attractive and vice versa (I would not be able to quantify though). Halle Berry, Naomi Campbell and Tyra Banks for instance are not Caucasoid but are desired by some Caucasoid men in preference to purely Caucasoid women. Hey, didn't you say that lighter skin was universally associated with greater beauty? Keep dancing. Another relapse into sollipsism. You have not proven anything except your foolishness... If immigrants do not feel that they will be accepted into the culture of their adopted state I can imagine that it can tend to turn one off. Even if they are reluctant to integrate, politicians can do a lot more to encourage (or even impose) integration. By the way, where was the mass rioting when the French banned the veil in their schools? Fischer is a great chess player but a sorry excuse for a man. He should name his own faults before he has a go at others'...
|
|