|
Post by asdf on Dec 8, 2005 20:14:52 GMT -5
Cherrypicked celebrities. Why I believe Europe already has that.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 8, 2005 20:24:01 GMT -5
There's still plenty of North Africans that have enough Black ancestry that if they create an offspring with a European the child won't come out looking White.Atlantis hate to break the news to you but not every North African has a White/Caucasoid phenotype.There's plenty of Black and Mulatto looking people in North Africa especially in Egypt.
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Dec 8, 2005 20:25:00 GMT -5
Blondes are like the white Siberian tiger: rare, prized, and hunted. This is true for women only. Actually blonde men suffer a mild disadvantage due to their femminine paedomorphic trait (fairness).
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 8, 2005 20:49:27 GMT -5
Well, even if everyone was civilized there still wouldn't be world peace. Even if the savages were "liquidated" there still would be conflict. It's human nature to war with one another, whether they are civilized or savage. And I never gave the impression it was your hypothesis. It was your agreement to it that was scary (to be honest, i wasn't surprised).
Yes, reason is the anti- thesis of religion. ummm... how is this relevant? do you still think I'm a Christian? Is that why you bring it up?
Now you're making assumption about me by implying that I adhere to a "slave morality," whatever that might be, without giving examples of what you mean. We've had enough discussions for you to be able to give examples. I guess you still think my respect for individual rights is a sign of weakness, or maybe you think I'm a Christian again... who really knows with you.
And yes, believing we should "liquidate" people is a scary thought. Whether it comes from Darwin's mouth or someone elses.
|
|
|
Post by murphee on Dec 8, 2005 21:17:15 GMT -5
I don't get it. I am a natural blonde, with the palest yellow-blonde hair, blue eyes and white skin (I've been told by people that I'm the whitest person they ever saw as I am one step away from being Albino.). I don't feel I'm at the top of the food chain, I've met many men who found brunettes more enticing, and I am not a leader of the pack because of my coloring. I am a white tiger however because of my intelligence and my talent & good looks LOL. You are not superior because you are blonde.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 8, 2005 21:47:43 GMT -5
If being blonde automatically makes you superior than why do so many blondes live in trailer parks after all blondism is pretty common among Scotch-Irish White trash Jerry Springer types.
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Dec 9, 2005 2:29:32 GMT -5
This is true for women only. Actually blonde men suffer a mild disadvantage due to their femminine paedomorphic trait (fairness). Blonde men seem to be attractive only among Nordicists and East Asian women.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 9, 2005 2:39:10 GMT -5
Aren't you married to a blonde though.
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Dec 9, 2005 6:41:44 GMT -5
Dark blonde. ;D But I prefer dark hair in a man. That said, I'm not going to ditch a guy because he has one feature I don't find to be all that. I can take blonde hair in a guy, but I draw the line at red.
|
|
|
Post by atlantis on Dec 9, 2005 10:24:56 GMT -5
Cherrypicked celebrities. Why I believe Europe already has that. Of course I post celebs only, it would be kind of hard to find unknown people's picture on the net. Personally I know a few North African/ Euro mixes, but I don't keep their pictures on my computer let alone post them without any autorization. Btw anybody is free to post pictures in that thread, so feel free to post any pictures that you think is more representative.
|
|
|
Post by tripleog on Dec 9, 2005 11:11:45 GMT -5
What are the largest minorities in Europe, in order and size? (By Ethnicity and general Region). I think somewhere like:
North Africans (mostly in France, Spain, Netherlands) - 5m? Turks (mostly in Germany, Netherlands, UK) - 3m? South Asians (mostly in the UK) - 2.5m Middle Easterners - 1m? Sub-Saharan Africans (mostly in the UK, and France) - 1m Caribbeans (mostly in the UK, Netherlands, and France) - 1m Orientals (everywhere) - 0.5-1m Latin Americans (Spain, Portugal) - 0.5-1m
|
|
|
Post by tripleog on Dec 9, 2005 12:00:22 GMT -5
As far as I know there are no cities which are majority non-white, non-native, or foreign born in Europe. But there are many candidates to pass this milestone by 2010, or 2020... UK: Leicester (300,000) - 36% non-white, 40% ethnic non-british (2001 ONS) London (7m) - 29% non-white, 40% ethnic non-british, 25% foreign born. (2001 ONS) <= the majority of londoners have foreign ancestry (e.g. 2nd/3rd generation whites) ^Metropolitan London (12-14 million) - 19.5% foreign born (2001 ONS) - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris + en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LondonBirmingham (1m) - 30% non-white, 35% ethnic non-british (2001 ONS) Luton (200,000) - 28% non-white, 35% ethnic non-british (2001 ONS) Netherlands: Amsterdam (700,000) - 55% "Netherlands Origin" - web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/cycle-list.htmlRotterdam (600,000) - 45% foreign born - www.abroadviewmagazine.com/fall_03/dutch_politics.htmlFrance: Metropolitan Paris (11.1 million) - 19.4% foreign born (1999) - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris - abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=1280843
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 9, 2005 19:14:07 GMT -5
Well, even if everyone was civilized there still wouldn't be world peace. Even if the savages were "liquidated" there still would be conflict. It's human nature to war with one another, whether they are civilized or savage. And I never gave the impression it was your hypothesis. It was your agreement to it that was scary (to be honest, i wasn't surprised). Yes, reason is the anti- thesis of religion. ummm... how is this relevant? do you still think I'm a Christian? Is that why you bring it up? Now you're making assumption about me by implying that I adhere to a "slave morality," whatever that might be, without giving examples of what you mean. We've had enough discussions for you to be able to give examples. I guess you still think my respect for individual rights is a sign of weakness, or maybe you think I'm a Christian again... who really knows with you. And yes, believing we should "liquidate" people is a scary thought. Whether it comes from Darwin's mouth or someone elses. Of course. Because you're so much more knowledgeable on the subject, than Charles Darwin. And are better equipped in saying, he is, and therefore I am, wrong. Also, where exactly did, I, or Darwin say that's what "should" happen? Beyond Good and Evil and The Anti-christ, details slave(herd) morality, and why it is so decadent.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 9, 2005 19:51:13 GMT -5
Am I the only person who disagrees with his view? I think not. Also, didn't Darwin believe that the stupid would consume the rest unless drastic action was done to limit their reproduction? ummm... yeah.... i believe so.... and it didn't happen. The man is not infalliable. And yes, you're often wrong.
You mention "slave morality" and then refused to go on about it. The answer to your question lies there. That's why you avoided my question.
Also you stated:
"It will be the complete opposite. The savage races of man must be liquidated for world peace (plus a few "civilized" religions), as prophesied by Charles Darwin:"
Perhaps it's poor choice of words on your part, which is yoru fault.. not mine.
Tell us more. Please, go on. Shoot yourself in the foot.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 9, 2005 23:58:59 GMT -5
Am I the only person who disagrees with his view? I think not. Also, didn't Darwin believe that the stupid would consume the rest unless drastic action was done to limit their reproduction? ummm... yeah.... i believe so.... and it didn't happen. The man is not infalliable. And yes, you're often wrong. You mention "slave morality" and then refused to go on about it. The answer to your question lies there. That's why you avoided my question. Also you stated: "It will be the complete opposite. The savage races of man must be liquidated for world peace (plus a few "civilized" religions), as prophesied by Charles Darwin:" Perhaps it's poor choice of words on your part, which is yoru fault.. not mine. Tell us more. Please, go on. Shoot yourself in the foot. I'd sooner shoot you too put you out of your stupidity laden misery, call it a coup de grace for mongoloids.
|
|