|
Post by wadad on Jan 16, 2006 12:36:11 GMT -5
I have to add there was also negroid eyptians well duh... "Petrie . . . published a study of the races of Egypt in the Pre-Dynastic and Proto-Dynastic periods working only on portrayals of them. Apart from the steatopygian race, he distinguishes six separate types: an aquiline type representative of a whiteskinned Libyan race; a 'plaited beard' type belonging to an invading race coming perhaps from the shores of the Red Sea, a 'sharp-nosed' type almost certainly from the Arabian Desert: a 'tilted-nose' type from Middle Egypt; a 'jutting beard' type from Lower Egypt; and a 'narrow-nose' type from Upper Egypt. Going on the images, there would thus have been seven different racial types in Egypt during the epochs we are considering>>" (pp 391) Egypt was and is a multi-racial region. Studies done on indiviual samples will yield results that lean to one side or another, thats common sense whether its for dental records or anything else.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 12:38:26 GMT -5
Im no Afrocentrist but you have to be fair though because it goes both ways.The Egyptians while showing they were different from Southerners also showed themselves different from other foreign people. Syrian, Nubian, Libyan, and Egyptian. Nice try Magneto,but your picture is severely altered to make it appear the Egyptian is that dark when its not...very sad! This is a better view.
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 16, 2006 12:41:11 GMT -5
It's hard to agree with you gelaye because if the majority of people in AE looked like the girl you posted above, modern egyptians would be better looking. lmao
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 12:46:17 GMT -5
Oh shut up. Why the hell would "caucasoids" be living just above the equator line, the hottest place on planet? Just get over the fact that ancient egyptians would be considered "black" if they lived today. lf not then african americans are honorary members of the "caucasoid" race! Move on with life for chrissake, racial retards. Ever heard of back migration?
|
|
|
Post by gelaye on Jan 16, 2006 13:21:26 GMT -5
Oh shut up. Why the hell would "caucasoids" be living just above the equator line, the hottest place on planet? Just get over the fact that ancient egyptians would be considered "black" if they lived today. lf not then african americans are honorary members of the "caucasoid" race! Move on with life for chrissake, racial retards. Ever heard of back migration? yes, but not of germanics migrating to africa 4000 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 13:27:33 GMT -5
yes, but not of germanics migrating to africa 4000 years ago. Germanic is a language, a culture, an ethnicity, not a race. Try to stay relevant to the topic.
|
|
mmmkay
Full Member
Internet Philosophiser, Leftist Hero
Posts: 127
|
Post by mmmkay on Jan 16, 2006 13:36:59 GMT -5
[/quote]Ever heard of back migration?[/quote] Where in that link you provided (LOL titled "cro-magnon superiority") does it ever say a substantial back migration occured in ancient egypt? Please quote or link sources that are peer-reviewed, don't bother with forums and psueodo-science, its not worth any serious persons time. That is, if you consider yourself serious. Irrelevant. The fact is, the other nations shown(syria, libya) are lily-white, while the egyptians are several shades darker in comparison. We should'nt be looking at murals for conclusive evidence of egyptian racial make-up anyway, such a conclusion would be laughable. Nice demonstration of your knowlegde of a sixth grade crayola history lesson, but no one see's your point in regards egypt's failure being due to "blacks from the south". Nobody said egypt never went through periodic changes, but you've failed to prove it was because of race. Egypt happens to be one of the most extensively documented civilizations in history. Once, the timbuktu manuscripts and meriotic are translated I'm sure the discussion would shift there. I've always also wondered why discusses of "white history" also tend to gravitate to greece and rome. For no less than the same funny and interesting reasons I suppose? There is evidence to suggest very culture of egypt itself was as a result of contact with "negroes from the south", knowledge of which you are obviously oblivious to, which is the reason you make oxy-moronic claims such as the above. In conclusion, I would say that Galton's big titties would explain his lack of balanced judgement (maybe one titty is bigger than the other). Indeed, he is more suited for a frat house than to a proper logical debate. Mayhaps you should start the first "caucasoids only" frathouse? ;D Whatever you do, take you and your titties somewhere else and don't come back here untill you've passed for pre-requisites for jr. high graduation (with proof lol) Just an idea. Good day.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 13:47:36 GMT -5
Read the entire study first before running off at the mouth parroting Pontikos.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 13:50:32 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're incoherent and behind. Go back and reread the link I posted and this time no smoking crack please.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 13:51:12 GMT -5
Read the entire study first before running off at the mouth parroting Pontikos. I am not parroting Pontikos its just he had posted that link.
|
|
mmmkay
Full Member
Internet Philosophiser, Leftist Hero
Posts: 127
|
Post by mmmkay on Jan 16, 2006 13:59:34 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're incoherent and behind. Go back and reread the link I posted and this time no smoking crack please. Sir, the burden of proof is upon you and only you. I won't waste my time with ageda-based pseudo-science of out-of-mainstream thought and opinions. There is a reason why they are on the fringe and in forums no one has heard of, the first step to validity is catching the clues to what they are. Even Dodona has more credence. Try again sir.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 14:04:48 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're wrong. Your attempt to marginalize sources with name calling is transparent at best. You're too lazy to mount a credible response. So you say words and phrases like "agenda-based-science" or "out-of-mainstream" because it is easier than thinking.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 14:11:31 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're wrong. Your attempt to marginalize sources with name calling is transparent at best. You're too lazy to mount a credible response. So you say words and phrases like "agenda-based-science" or "out-of-mainstream" because it is easier than thinking. This coming from a dumb peckerwood who believes malcolm X was an Uncle Tom and talks as if he represents the NOI.
|
|
mmmkay
Full Member
Internet Philosophiser, Leftist Hero
Posts: 127
|
Post by mmmkay on Jan 16, 2006 14:17:52 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're wrong. Your attempt to marginalize sources with name calling is transparent at best. You're too lazy to mount a credible response. So you say words and phrases like "agenda-based-science" or "out-of-mainstream" because it is easier than thinking. LOL at the very least Im *still* waiting for your response to my earlier postings. Who's the lazy one here? If would stop your jabbering and actually answer to my challenges we'd be getting somewhere. Here, I'll make it easy for you. 1. Prove that egypt "fell into decline" as a result of contact with blacks (which is an oxy-moron if you ask me) 2. Prove that the egyptians were (beyond all doubt) "caucasoids" with a minority of "negroes", with the most credible and up-to-date information available. 3.Prove that you've passed high school graduation, or at the very least jr high. ;D 9 (not neccessary but interesting nonetheless) Start your arguments in proper presentation (in whatever order) and we can actually continue the debate. Good day.
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 16, 2006 15:00:15 GMT -5
mmmkay, you're wrong. Your attempt to marginalize sources with name calling is transparent at best. You're too lazy to mount a credible response. So you say words and phrases like "agenda-based-science" or "out-of-mainstream" because it is easier than thinking. This coming from a dumb peckerwood who believes malcolm X was an Uncle Tom and talks as if he represents the NOI. Faint praise coming from a well practiced and well rehearsed Uncle Tom like yourself.
|
|