Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Thread Started on Sept 26, 2005, 8:59pm »
This is mostly a summary of varioius other threads about that topic:
The Sinid spectrum is very important for the Mongolid race, its the most numerous and culturally most evolved group, includes the great nations of China, Korea and Japan. The Sinoid spectrum also includes the Palaemongolid reduced-infantilised, and partly with Weddoid-Negritid types mixed groups of the South, which became their Mongolid component from the Sinoids in various waves.
As I said the main facts are: A) There are two basic Mongolid types of the North, SINID AND TUNGID. B) In Sinids is a gradient from North to South which was distorted by the Han Chinese and other movements, but the real indigenous populations still show a clear pattern (aka Manchu - North vs Yao - South).
The morphological differences between the two types of the North (Tungid and Sinid) are just obvious. The typical low forehead, broad-flat-fat face with massive cheekbones of Tungids is just typical, as are the higher, finer, narrower and more differentiated faces of the Sinid type: http://img184.echo.cx/my.php?image=knussmanns4342mg.jpg
Generally I repeat the difference between Sinid and Palaemongolid: Btw, did you ever saw the LBI maps for Asia? If you get one you might notice the are of lower LBI in North East China. Some metrical differences from the Sinid to the Palaemongolid (South) areas: .) higher body height. .) higher skelic index (shorter legs). .) with some regional exceptions lower LBI .) lower HLI .) higher absolute middle face height .) lower nasal index on the skull .) lighter pigmentation
For Eastern Chinese (not the West) coastline its like that: Northernmost - Tungids: broad face, high LBI, low HLI, strong subcutaneous fat, extreme Mongolid features (epicanthus, high cheekbones etc.), medium-tall, etc. North - Nordsinids: narrow face+noses, low LBI, high HLI, medium (for Mongolids) subcutaneous fat, Mongolid features, tall, light pigmented etc. Central - Mittelsinids: two variants, one rather broad faced, other medium-narrow faced, higher LBI, but regional differences, high HLI, medium fat, Mongolid features, medium-tall, medium pigmented for the region etc. Southern - Suedsinids: broader faces, noses+higher LBI on average, regional differences, very high HLI, lower fat, Mongolid features weaker, medium-short, stronger pigmented, longer legs etc.
Furthermore Mittelsinid is really not the best term, but still the most useful one, for variants in question. Because the coastal group which is what you described (broad faced-headed etc.) is just one element. Whereas Nordsinid is clear and Suedsinids again, Mittelsinid is really a term for grouping all the groups in between together, including the main variant, mainly on the Central Chinese coastal region, but expanding to the South. The Tibetids, which some, most include into the Mittelsinid spectrum, is a different subtype obviously, but certain features they have in common.
The more dry Northern millet farmer regions, the central Hwangho was and mostly is a Nordsinid centre. Mittelsinids are more common in the rice farmer areas of the great rivers. The Nordsinids were the "original Chinese" and expanded Southwards, assimilating first the Mittelsinid rice farmers and then the Suedsinid farmers and H-G groups. They pressed them partly Southwards, empires in the South, Manchuria was slowly made (Nord-) Sinid by race too. Most typical populations Manchu, Lolo (Yi - original group-upper class) for Nordsinid, Miao Mittelsinid, Yao Suedsinid.
Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
Re: The Sinid spectrum « Reply #1 on Sept 26, 2005, 9:01pm »
Nordsinids show clear Mongolid features (unlike the partly similar looking Dayakid-Palaemongolids of some areas which have quite often high bridged noses etc. too).
Typical is a higher FI and NI (long-narrow face and nose compared to other Mongolid core types), higher body height on average, more leptomorphic build, mesocephalic to dolichocephalic mostly, the seldom brachycephalics have a turriform/dinariomorphic (narrow-short-high) head form.
Typical Nordsinid-Tungid North Korean:
Pred. Nordsinid Koreans:
The Coshu or Jakunin-type (Lundman)/Cosiu (Saller) of Japan and Korea: More common in the upper class, basically a mixture out of Nordsinid with progressive Palaemongolid and Ainuid admixture and social selection involved. Refined features, narrower face and nose, which is more often aquiline/convex nose, but overall still Mongolid appearance:
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #3 on Oct 1, 2005, 5:10am »
Quote:
These 'handsome fellows' are a Southen Chinese type I presume:
I won't confine them to a Southern Chinese type. The middle one is more commonly found in the north. The one on the left of the pic looks obviously Southern, but with an atypically extreme wide nose.
P.S. Obviously not flattering combinations of features in these examples...so is 'handsome fellows' said out of goodwill or with sarcasm?
Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #5 on Oct 1, 2005, 2:32pm »
Yes, the one in the middle is more progressive, has stronger Mongolid features (eyes f.e.) and definitely (rather Mittel-) Sinid looking. The right is Suedsinid-Palaemongolid. The other one (left) show obvious non-Mongolid admixture, their noses look even for Palaemongolids extreme, even for Weddids they are wide, seem to be Palaemongolid-Negritid one of those survivors...
Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #7 on Oct 1, 2005, 3:12pm »
In fact under Weddoid many types are lumped together, basically almost all non-Mongolid variants of South East Asia, some being closer to Europids, others look similar to infantile Mongolids, others, mosts are similar to Australids. But a narrow nose is not typical for the type usually meant with Weddid, an extremely broad neither though. Various S-/SE-variants: http://www.swan.ac.uk/visualanthropology/projects/003_Dalton/lithographs.htm
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #8 on Oct 1, 2005, 4:50pm »
Agrippa can you elaborate more on gracil indid sexual dimorphism? in skandi you very briefly mentioned the basic differences in body build, hair, height etc between the two sexes-
other than the nord indid category (in terms of looks) the other ones blend into each other; a more clear delineation might be seen in south east asia - excepting papuans - irian jaynese and some other local isolated groups such as the andamanese jarawa - onge types including the island mongoloid people from the same archipelago; there must have been a great possibility for an amalgam in the phillippines archipelago but without the sexual dimorphism as is seen in gracil indids.
how well developed are the brows in gracil indids? is it moderate for the particular type?
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #9 on Oct 1, 2005, 4:55pm »
are the todas gracil or nord indid like? and how metrically distanced are the todas from neighbouring non consanguinous communities such as the badagas, irulas, kotas, etc.
the todas look like distinctive hirsute - aplopiecik (aploplecia) dolicocephals.
Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #10 on Oct 1, 2005, 4:58pm »
I repeat it better, highest sexual dimorphism in Gracilindids, somewhat lower in Nordindids (comparable to other leptomorphic Europids) and in Indomelanids, lowest in Weddids relatively.
Gracilindids have not that strong brows, if you mean torus supraorbitalis, are rather weak, hairiness is medium for Europids, in local variants rather low, Nordindids are more hairy.
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #11 on Oct 1, 2005, 7:14pm »
Quote:
In fact under Weddoid many types are lumped together, basically almost all non-Mongolid variants of South East Asia, some being closer to Europids, others look similar to infantile Mongolids, others, mosts are similar to Australids. But a narrow nose is not typical for the type usually meant with Weddid, an extremely broad neither though.
Some Indians have narrower noses than any Europeans:
Kashmiri women:
Indoids of different variants, most are Bengalis (NE India):
Another Bengali couple:
Quote:
Gracilindids have not that strong brows, if you mean torus supraorbitalis, are rather weak
Why? Mongoloid admixture?
Veddids, hard to say whether they already contain a Mediterranoid-blend. The two I posted before are from Sri Lanka.
Nordindids:
« Last Edit: Oct 1, 2005, 7:55pm by One Humanity »
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #13 on Oct 1, 2005, 8:01pm »
Those are Eickstedt's pictures and the woman was classified as Nordindid in a book so the men should be alike. There's a possibility that the man at the top is just Indid.
The Bengali faces are a selection, I searched for those with the narrow noses. Most had rather thick-tipped more prominent noses.
PS: I added more pictures.
« Last Edit: Oct 1, 2005, 8:06pm by One Humanity »
Joined: Jan 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 3,288 Location: Asgard
Re: The Sinoid spectrum in East Asia « Reply #14 on Oct 1, 2005, 9:00pm »
Quote:
are the todas gracil or nord indid like? and how metrically distanced are the todas from neighbouring non consanguinous communities such as the badagas, irulas, kotas, etc.
the todas look like distinctive hirsute - aplopiecik (aploplecia) dolicocephals.
The Todas are a really interesting group and fall mostly in the Nordindid category, though they have Gracilindid and Indomelanid elements too. They seem to be a Nordindid isolate there, but its even more interesting if knowing that they are vegetarians and have quite exotic social structures partly.. Really fascinating and strange ethnic group.
Quote:
Some Indians have narrower noses than any Europeans:
Yes, but neither Sikhs nor Kashmiri are Weddoid, they are both Indid, mostly Nordindid, even two of the most typical Nordindid groups and quite Europid/Caucasoid and progressive in all features.
The Bengali examples are more Gracilindid and seem to be of Upper caste (some with Nordindid influence), because Bengalis in general are a Gracilindid-Weddid mix often with the later being dominant. Calcutta is in many districts even pred. Weddid.
Quote:
Why? Mongoloid admixture?
Dont think so, rather local adaptation to the tropical climate, partly reduction of the tropical farmers. The stronger sexual dimorphism and part reduction seem to be the main differences, together with the somewhat darker skin etc. to Nordindids. Some Weddoids have quite infantile characteristics too, we could speculate that an admixture played a role in the forming of Gracilindids.
There are different Weddoid types, some are mixed with Negritids, some show more Protoeuropid characteristics, others are totally infantilised, another type goes in a rather Mongoloid looking direction or has direct Mongolid admixture.
In the system of v. Eickstedt: Series D: Homines s. albi protomorphi Alteuropide - Varietas 1: H. s. veddalis Weddide a.)H. s. v. ceylonensis Wedda b.)H. s. v. gondicus Gondide c.)H. s. v. malicus Malide d.)H. s. v. toala Toalide e.)H. s. v. siamesis Ostweddide
Malids are in the South of the Indian subcontinent, especially in the mountains of Ostghat and Anamalai. Kurumber, Panyer and Kadr are quite typical. They are very dark, strong pigmented, have tight curls and show Negritid influences. (Negritids are in a pure form no longer present as groups there, but are probably the oldest and most primitive form of the subcontinent). Those Negritids are after Eickstedt related to the Andamanids.
So Malids are more or less Weddids (Gondid is typical) influenced by Negritids as a tropical forest form especially in the mountainous and areas of retreat with darker pigmentation and more primitive features.